Wunderman VS PostSharp

• Global Presence
  Wunderman Thompson operates in various countries around the world, giving them a vast network and diverse market insights.
• Integrated Services
  The company offers a wide range of services including marketing, advertising, consulting, and technology, providing clients with comprehensive solutions.
• Innovation
  Known for their innovative approach, Wunderman Thompson consistently leverages cutting-edge technologies to develop creative and effective campaigns.
• Strong Client Portfolio
  Wunderman Thompson works with a wide array of high-profile clients across various industries, underscoring their credibility and expertise.
• Experienced Workforce
  The agency employs experienced professionals with diverse skill sets, enhancing the quality and creativity of their offerings.

Possible disadvantages

• High Costs
  The comprehensive services and high-quality deliverables often come at a premium price, which may not be accessible for smaller clients or startups.
• Complexity of Operations
  The large size and extensive service offerings can sometimes lead to complexities in communication and project management.
• Competition
  The market for integrated marketing services is highly competitive, and staying ahead requires constant innovation and adaptation.
• Over-reliance on Major Clients
  A significant portion of their revenue may come from a few large clients, which can pose risks if relationships with these clients deteriorate.
• Scalability Challenges
  Despite their global presence, scaling certain localized operations swiftly to meet sudden spikes in demand can be challenging.

• Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
  PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
• Code Reusability
  By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
• Maintainability
  PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
• Performance
  PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
• Rich Library of Aspects
  It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
• Debugging Complexity
  The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
• Cost
  PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
• Build Time Overhead
  The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
• Vendor Lock-in
  Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

Wunderman Cannes 2011 workshop review: 'How To Dominate the World'

More videos

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos