Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
WOW

WOW.js VS Processing

Compare WOW.js VS Processing and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WOW.js logo WOW.js

Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.

Processing logo Processing

C++ and Java programming at the speed of thought.
  • WOW.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-11
  • Processing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12

We recommend LibHunt Processing for discovery and comparisons of trending Processing projects.

WOW.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WOW.js is simple to implement. By linking the library and adding a few data attributes, users can quickly set up animations on scroll without extensive coding.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The library is designed to work across various browsers, ensuring a consistent animation experience for most users.
  • Lightweight
    WOW.js is a small library that adds minimal weight to web pages, making it an ideal choice for developers looking to enhance user experience without slowing down page load times.
  • Extensive Animation Options
    With WOW.js, there are numerous animation effects available, allowing developers to apply dynamic and varied animations easily.

Possible disadvantages of WOW.js

  • Limited Customization
    While WOW.js offers a variety of animations, deeply customizing these effects may require additional code or integration with other libraries.
  • Dependency on Animate.css
    WOW.js relies on Animate.css for animations, which means developers must include both libraries for full functionality.
  • Lacks Updates and Support
    The library is not frequently updated, and there may be limited community support compared to more widely used libraries.
  • Performance Issues on Heavy Pages
    On pages with numerous animations or complex content, WOW.js might impact performance, leading to jittery or delayed animations.

Processing features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Processing has a simple and straightforward syntax, making it accessible for beginners and quick for prototyping.
  • Visualization Capabilities
    Processing excels at creating visually appealing graphics, animations, and interactive content.
  • Active Community
    Processing has a large, active community that contributes tutorials, examples, libraries, and forums support.
  • Cross-Platform
    Processing is cross-platform, allowing developers to run their sketches on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • Educational Focus
    Processing is designed with teaching in mind and is widely used in educational settings to teach programming concepts.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    Processing can be easily integrated with other creative coding tools and software such as Arduino.

Possible disadvantages of Processing

  • Performance Limitations
    Processing may not be the best choice for highly performance-critical applications, especially those requiring intense computation.
  • Limited Functionality
    While great for graphics and animation, Processing might be limited for other types of development like database-driven applications.
  • Java Dependency
    Processing is built on top of Java, which may not be ideal or preferred for all users, especially those who do not wish to work with Java.
  • Scalability Issues
    Processing sketches might face challenges when scaling up to large or more complex projects.
  • Basic IDE
    The Processing IDE is quite basic compared to more advanced development environments, potentially limiting for complex project management.

WOW.js videos

+ Add

Hướng dẫn sử dụng Animation.css và WOW.js cho website

Processing videos

+ Add

Processing - Kickstarter Board Game Review

More videos:

  • Review - Processing or p5.js? My opinions
  • Review - Processing: A Game of Serving Humanity Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WOW.js and Processing)

WOW.js

Processing

Animation
100 100%
Animation
0% 0
3D
10 10%
3D
90% 90
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
JavaScript
100 100%
JavaScript
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WOW.js and Processing. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Processing seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 340 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WOW.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WOW.js yet. Tracking of WOW.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Processing mentions (340)

  • Processing Foundation is hiring a Processing Project Lead!
    You can learn more about the Processing software and community at processing.org, or visit the Processing4 repository, Processing website repository, and our roadmap. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • Cloth
    >web dev/gradle/java knowledge to build something like this Web dev (and not just in java) is dominated by "component integration" concerns, containing lots of structure but little content. Computation is delegated to libraries, and the problems more about complexity of integration (at build time) scaled distributed systems (at runtime). In contrast, writing a simulation is computationally intensive, so... - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Relax while watching bouncing particles making connections when they get closer
    See https://bleuje.com/animationsite/2024_1/ for a collection of programmatic black and white animations made with https://processing.org/ He even publishes the source code on https://github.com/Bleuje/processing-animations-code/tree/ma.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Cosy Computing
    This is a nice comment and speaks to the notion that every medium has its own characteristic feel even is not "better" by some metric (e.g. Vinyl vs CDs, vs cassettes, vs live radio, vs mp3, etc.). A similar feeling of immediacy without any intervening concerns is hacking away at a Processing [https://processing.org/] sketch. In some sense it's the complete opposite of retro computing, but it engenders similar... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Want to be a software engineer? The difficulty of top down learning.
    In high school the first languages and tools I remember using were things like Turing, Processing, GreenFoot and BlueJ. All of which were learning tools, and with the exception of Turing, were Java abstractions with the main focus on graphical programming. These tools allowed me to do some pretty cool things, very quickly. These early experience are really what inspired my interest. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WOW.js and Processing, you can also consider the following products

Lax.js - Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

OpenFrameworks - openFrameworks

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.

TouchDesigner - TouchDesigner is a visual development platform that equips you with the tools you need to create stunning realtime projects and rich user experiences.

Loading...