WebVM Reviews

BrowserStack Reviews

WebVM mentions (7)

• Running Python code in a sandbox with MicroPython and WASM

  The architecture is a fairly straightforward WebAssembly-native monolithic kernel. Most of the complexities come from making things work well within the browser constraints for real world, large apps. We have quite a bit of experience on the topic however, these are previous projects of ours: WebVM (https://webvm.io): x86 Debian shell running client-side in the browser via x86 -> WebAssembly JIT compilation... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago

• A Linux-like kernel in a browser tab – deep dive in the BrowserPod architecture

  Thanks :-) We have been building WebAssembly-based products for a while now, so for us it's second nature. But I think you are right, most developers, even experienced ones, have not yet come to grasp the fully capabilities of the Web platform in conjunction with WebAssembly. You might find previous projects from us also interesting: * WebVM (https://webvm.io): x86 virtualization in the browser. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• JSLinux Now Supports x86_64

  A somewhat better solution via tailnet you can find in https://webvm.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• BrowserPod: Universal in-browser sandbox powered by WASM (starting with Node.js)

  Hello HN community, I am very happy to share with you BrowserPod for Node.js - a sandboxed Node runtime, compiled to WebAssembly, that runs completely in the your browser. BrowserPod builds on our previous work on WebAssembly virtualization, see WebVM (https://webvm.io) as an example. The environment is not a simple set of shims, but the "real" Node.js, including support for filesystem, multiple processes and... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• What Happened to WebAssembly

  We use WebAssembly aggressively at Leaning Technologies across our tools. WebAssembly makes it possible to: * Run x86 binaries in the browser via JIT-ting (https://webvm.io) * Run Java applications in the browser, including Minecraft (https://browsercraft.cheerpj.com) * Run node.js containers in the browser (https://browserpod.io) It's an incredibly powerful tool, but very much a power-user one. Expecting your... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

BrowserStack mentions (8)

• Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma

  This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness

  Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Unsupported country

  If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 3 years ago

• Windows vs Mac?

  For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 3 years ago

• Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?

  I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 3 years ago