WebPagetest VS Ember-cli

• Detailed Performance Metrics
  WebPagetest provides extensive performance metrics, including Time to First Byte (TTFB), Speed Index, and First Contentful Paint, allowing for a deep understanding of website performance.
• Real Browsers
  Tests are conducted using real browsers, which ensures that the results are closely aligned with real user experiences.
• Geolocation Testing
  Supports testing from various locations worldwide, which is useful for understanding performance in different markets.
• Advanced Testing Options
  Offers advanced options such as scripting for complex interactions, multi-step transactions, and authenticating users.
• Free and Open Source
  WebPagetest is free to use and its code is open-source, allowing for community contributions and customizable implementations.
• Video Capture
  Provides video capture of the loading process, giving a visual representation of loading performance.
• Waterfall Charts
  Generates detailed waterfall charts that help identify bottlenecks in resource loading.

Possible disadvantages

• Complexity for Beginners
  The extensive options and detailed metrics may be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with web performance testing.
• Intermittent Performance
  As a free service, sometimes the performance can be inconsistent due to high demand or limited resources.
• Dated Interface
  The user interface of the website is somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience.
• Limited Instant Support
  Lack of immediate support options can be a downside; users often have to rely on forums and community support.
• Potential for Inconsistent Results
  Results might vary between tests due to variability in internet speed, server conditions, and other external factors.
• Configuration Overhead
  Advanced testing options require a significant amount of configuration, which can be time-consuming.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

WebPageTest - The State of the Web

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• A PageSpeed insight report, but for every page in your domain

  Trust neither. The most optimal option I've found is webpagetest.org Its been quite handy lately. This tool does look interesting. Source: over 3 years ago

• How are you all accurately checking your website load time? Not sure PageSpeedInsights is very helpful.

  Webpagetest.org is another. Pagespeedinsights and lighthouse are great for identifying page load issues to fix, but actual page load times will always vary between the user and your web server. Universal analytics has some page load... Source: over 3 years ago

• Extreme confusing over Speed Index results -- webpagetest.org

  So I am working on rebuilding our company's site with a new stack. I am running tests using webpagetest.org, and I am having trouble fully understanding the speed index results as well as the film strip view. The page renders quite fast... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago