Webpacker VS JUST

Webpacker mentions (15)

• Asset Pipeline JS Migration

  Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker

  This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How to setup ruby on rails + Angular

  In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: over 1 year ago

• Using Rails+ReactJS with Webpacker on VS Code?

  Instead of using webpacker you should move to esbuild or importmap. Webpacker has been retired a few months ago (cf https://github.com/rails/webpacker) There are videos explained how to set this up (e.g. For importmap https://learnetto.com/tutorials/how-to-use-react-with-rails-7. Source: about 2 years ago

• Webpacker 6 development continues as shakacode/shakapacker

  But it's there in the webpacker README now, if anyone hasn't seen it. https://github.com/rails/webpacker. Source: over 2 years ago

JUST mentions (0)