Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Webpack VS Pixi.js

Compare Webpack VS Pixi.js and see what are their differences

EcholoN
Holistic service management: service, support + customer care. From Ticketing to Helpdesk, Service Desk, ITSM to Enterprise Service Management featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices
  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Pixi.js videos

+ Add

PixiJS Crash Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webpack and Pixi.js)

Webpack

Pixi.js

Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
51 51%
Javascript UI Libraries
49% 49
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Webpack and Pixi.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Webpack and Pixi.js

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Pixi.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Pixi.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack seems to be a lot more popular than Pixi.js. While we know about 221 links to Webpack, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Pixi.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webpack mentions (221)

  • Svelte Series-2: How to install Svelte
    If we don't want to use Vite or SvelteKit, or if we don't have the means to use them, then we need to integrate Svelte with our own environment. In our daily development, we usually use webpack or Rollup as our project's module management packaging tool. Therefore, I will introduce these two environments, how to build the Svelte environment. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Practical and Beginner friendly guide for speeding up your web-apps
    There are various tools available that manage the size of bundled assets. We are going to use the example of a popular and widely used bundler named Webpack, and practically look at many of the optimization techniques it offers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Webpack: The Web Module Bundler
    Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide
    Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webpack and Pixi.js, you can also consider the following products

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

Loading...