Software Alternatives & Startups

Webhook Relay VS SOAPEngine

Compare Webhook Relay VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Webhook Relay

Webhook Relay receives, transforms and delivers webhooks to any destination — a public URL, a private server, or your localhost. With durable retries your events survive outages, deploys and flaky endpoints, so nothing slips through.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $9.99 / Monthly
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Webhook Relay seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.

social mentions
7 vs 0
Webhooks popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Webhook Relay
SOAPEngine
Website webhookrelay.com github.com
Pricing
Freemium $9.99 / Monthly Official pricing
—
Company Startup from the United Kingdom · 1 - 9 employees · 2017 —
Listed in

About Webhook Relay and SOAPEngine

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Webhook Relay
SOAPEngine

What is Webhook Relay? Webhook Relay is an enterprise-ready webhook delivery platform — SOC 2 Type II certified, encrypted at rest and in transit, with SSO, audit logs, role-based access and an optional self-hosted deployment (see Enterprise-ready below). It is a secure tunneling solution that...

Read more about Webhook Relay

No description of SOAPEngine yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Webhook Relay 7 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Ease of Use
    Webhook Relay provides an intuitive user interface and straightforward setup process, making it accessible for developers to manage webhooks without extensive configuration or coding.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    It supports a variety of protocols including HTTP/S, MQTT, and WebSockets, enabling flexibility in integration with different types of applications and platforms.
  • Security Features
    The platform includes features like IP whitelisting, bearer token authentication, and end-to-end encryption to ensure secure transfer of data and restricted access.
  • Real-time Data Forwarding
    Webhook Relay offers real-time data forwarding capabilities, ensuring timely delivery of webhook events to the intended destination.
  • Scalability
    It is designed to handle a large number of webhooks efficiently, making it suitable for businesses with heavy data flow requirements.
  • Durable Delivery
    Automated retries over minutes, hours and weeks.
  • Webhook Throttling
    Don't let your servers get overloaded, you can choose a stable rate that the webhooks will be delivered to your server
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Webhook Relay
SOAPEngine

No analysis of Webhook Relay yet.

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Webhook Relay
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Webhook Relay and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Webhook Relay 7 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions
  • RudderStack: How Pachyderm Pipelines Help Parse Customer Event Data
    Apart from customer events, Pachyderm collects data from Pachyderm Hub, its SaaS platform. This data mainly includes the customers' workspace usage details and other metrics related to the platform usage and performance. Pachyderm... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • Self-hosted business intelligence with Metabase
    Webhook Relay account - will be used to expose the Metabase to the internet, so we can access it. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • Manage your meetings like a boss with self-hosted calender
    If you don't have a static IP or your network is behind a CGNAT, you can use https://webhookrelay.com instead. We will be providing a tutorial on that setup as well. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

View more

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Webhook Relay and SOAPEngine

When comparing Webhook Relay and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.