
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Webgrind seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
k
ktrace
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | en.wikipedia.org |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Drupal Quickstart 0.8: Profiling with XDebug and Webgrind
No ktrace videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using Webgrind and ktrace. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Is there a way to read the xDebug 3 Profiler results on Windows? I've tried: 1) QCacheGrind?(https://sourceforge.net/projects/qcachegrindwin/) 2) WinCacheGrind (https://github.com/ceefour/wincachegrind/releases/tag/1.1) 3) Webgrind... Source: over 4 years ago
Tracking ktrace since Mar 2021.
When comparing Webgrind and ktrace, you can also consider the following products.

Callgrind is a profiling tool and KCachegrind is able to visualize output of the profilers.
Compare Kcachegrind to Webgrind or ktrace:

DTrace is a performance analysis and troubleshooting tool for Solaris, Mac OS X and FreeBSD.
Compare DTrace to Webgrind or ktrace:

WinCacheGrind is a viewer for cachegrind.out files generated by xdebug 2.
Compare WinCacheGrind to Webgrind or ktrace:

Trace system calls and signals. A diagnostic, debugging and instructional userspace utility.
Compare strace to Webgrind or ktrace:

Profiling Viewer for Mac OS X opens and visualizes callgrind files
Compare Profiling Viewer to Webgrind or ktrace:

Perf is a simple app monitoring solution paired with meaningful alerts.
Compare perf to Webgrind or ktrace: