Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Web ScrapBook VS SiteSucker

Compare Web ScrapBook VS SiteSucker and see what are their differences

Lenns.io
The feed reader for people that want to be in control featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Web ScrapBook logo Web ScrapBook

A browser extension that captures the web page faithfully with highly customizable configurations.

SiteSucker logo SiteSucker

SiteSucker is a Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet.
  • Web ScrapBook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-07
  • SiteSucker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-03

Web ScrapBook features and specs

  • Comprehensive Archiving
    Web ScrapBook is capable of saving complete web pages, including style sheets, images, and even dynamic content (JavaScript). This ensures that users get an exact replica of the web page as seen in their browser.
  • Flexible Formats
    The tool supports multiple formats for saving web pages, including single HTML files, MAFF (Mozilla Archive Format files), and more. This offers flexibility depending on user needs.
  • Browser Integration
    Web ScrapBook provides browser extensions for major web browsers like Firefox and Chrome, making it convenient to save web pages directly as you browse.
  • Organization Options
    It allows users to organize saved pages into folders, which can be helpful for managing large amounts of saved content efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Being an open source project, it allows developers to contribute to its improvement, inspect the code for security, and customize the tool according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Web ScrapBook

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Web ScrapBook can be a bit cumbersome, particularly for users who are not familiar with installing and configuring browser extensions or local backend servers.
  • Inconsistent Performance
    Some users may experience inconsistent performance or occasional bugs, especially when handling very complex or dynamic web pages.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    The browser extensions are primarily designed for desktop browsers, limiting its usability on mobile devices.
  • Maintenance Dependency
    As an open source project, its active maintenance and development depend on community contributions. This can result in periods where issues may not be promptly addressed.
  • Learning Curve
    To make full use of its capabilities, users may need to spend time learning the various features and configurations, which can be challenging for beginners.

SiteSucker features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SiteSucker is well-known for its user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to set up and start downloading websites quickly.
  • Automation
    The tool automates the process of downloading entire websites, making it efficient for users who need offline access to web content.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize which parts of a website to download, such as specific file types or paths, offering flexibility in terms of content selection.
  • Offline Access
    With SiteSucker, you can view downloaded websites offline, which is beneficial for environments with limited internet connectivity.
  • Operating Systems Compatibility
    SiteSucker is available for macOS and iOS, catering to a broad user base using Apple's ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of SiteSucker

  • Limited to Apple Ecosystem
    SiteSucker is only available for macOS and iOS, which restricts its use for people who are on other operating systems like Windows or Android.
  • Resource Intensive
    Downloading entire websites can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the performance of your device during the download process.
  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
    Downloading entire websites may violate copyright laws or terms of service, posing legal and ethical issues for users.
  • Not Free
    SiteSucker requires a purchase from the App Store, which may be a drawback for users looking for a free alternative.
  • Occasional Errors
    Some users have reported occasional errors, such as incomplete downloads or issues with updating the cached content.

Analysis of Web ScrapBook

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Web ScrapBook is generally regarded as a good tool for web page archiving and data preservation. It is especially favored by those needing detailed and accurate preservation of web content.

Why this product is good

  • Web ScrapBook is considered good by many users because it allows you to save web pages in a more accurate form compared to many other tools, maintaining the original look and functionality, including CSS, images, and JavaScript. It supports capturing a variety of data types, organizing saved pages into a structured format, and offers features like full-text search and annotation. Additionally, it is open-source and has a strong community contributing to its development.

Recommended for

    Researchers, archivists, developers, and anyone needing to save and organize web content accurately. It is particularly useful for users who appreciate open-source software and need advanced archiving capabilities.

Analysis of SiteSucker

Overall verdict

  • Overall, SiteSucker is a reliable and effective tool for anyone who needs to download and backup websites, whether for personal use or research. It performs well with few reported issues, making it a trusted option among its users.

Why this product is good

  • SiteSucker is considered a good tool for downloading entire websites for offline viewing. It is praised for its ease of use, allowing users to capture text, images, and other media from websites effortlessly. The software is available for macOS and iOS, making it a versatile choice for Apple users looking to archive web content.

Recommended for

  • Researchers who need to save website content for offline analysis.
  • Individuals who want to archive websites for personal reference.
  • Users with limited internet connectivity who wish to access web content without a connection.
  • Mac and iOS users looking for a native application to download websites.

Web ScrapBook videos

No Web ScrapBook videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SiteSucker videos

+ Add

How to download any template file using SiteSucker in MAC OS |SUDO_TN

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web ScrapBook and SiteSucker)

Web ScrapBook

SiteSucker

Utilities
56 56%
Utilities
44% 44
Download Manager
58 58%
Download Manager
42% 42
Web Copier
52 52%
Web Copier
48% 48
Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Web ScrapBook and SiteSucker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Web ScrapBook and SiteSucker

Web ScrapBook Reviews

We have no reviews of Web ScrapBook yet.
Be the first one to post

SiteSucker Reviews

15 Best Httrack Alternatives Offline Browser Utility
SiteSucker, available exclusively for Mac, is a user-friendly application that can download websites and their entire content, including HTML pages, images, videos, and other files.
Source: technicalustad.com
15 Best Website Downloaders & Website Copier – Save website locally to read offline
The SiteSucker app is a Macintosh application available for both Mac and iOS platforms. With SiteSucker, you can download a website and make it locally available online. This will enable you to share the website and have users that do not have access to the Internet access it as if they are connected to the Internet.
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
8 Best HTTrack Alternatives and Similar Software
SiteSucker is a program that allows you to create local copies of webpages. SiteSucker “locates” the files it grabs by default, enabling you to view a website offline, although it may also save sites without making any changes.
Source: www.regendus.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Web ScrapBook seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web ScrapBook mentions (3)

  • which should use to archive webpages singlefile or webscrapbook?
    WebScrapBook just seems bloaty to me, but haven't tried it and have no need for my personal notes in the archives. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • WebScrapBook, the successor of legacy ScrapBook X add-on, is complete
    After a 5–year struggle, the tremendous migration of ScrapBook X to WebScrapBook is complete. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Fandom Wiki (formerly Wikia) is deleting wikis on sexual topics in 2 weeks
    This extension for websites may help those who are backing up things though it can no do a full dump it is useful if you want to back up a specific page you are interested in https://github.com/danny0838/webscrapbook. Source: almost 4 years ago

SiteSucker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SiteSucker yet. Tracking of SiteSucker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web ScrapBook and SiteSucker, you can also consider the following products

HTTrack - HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility.

GNU Wget - GNU Wget is a free software package for retrieving files using HTTP(S) and FTP, the most...

WebCopy - Cyotek WebCopy is a free tool for copying full or partial websites locally onto your harddisk for offline viewing.

ScrapBook - ScrapBook is a Firefox extension, which helps you to save Web pages and manage the collection.

Offline Explorer - MetaProducts Offline Explorer is a Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/Vista program that allows you to...

Offline Pages Pro - Offline Pages Pro is probably the world’s most advanced offline browser.

Loading...