
authzed
Cerbos
Aserto
Oso
Ory
Supabase
Permify
Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers

Decode and verify SSL/TLS certificates online. Extract X.509 details including issuer, validity, SAN, and fingerprint. Fast, secure, and browser-based.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Warrant seems to be a lot more popular than Cert Decoder. While we know about 22 links to Warrant, we've tracked only 1 mention of Cert Decoder.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | warrant.dev | certdecoder.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Warrant yet.
Cert Decoder is a free online tool that helps you decode X.509 SSL/TLS certificates in PEM format. It instantly shows important information like the issuer, expiry date, SAN entries, and fingerprint. All data is processed locally in your browser, so nothing is ever sent or stored elsewhere.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Warrant yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Warrant and Cert Decoder.
Cert Decoder's answer:
I built certdecoder.com over the weekend for my own needs. Sometimes in my work, I need to verify and check certificate details.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com was built using just JavaScript and HTML—simple, fast, and with all processing happening locally in your browser, so no certificate data is sent to any server
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Cert Decoder's answer:
Simple, fast, and reliable. Some similar tools can’t even decode basic certificates. I rigorously tested my tool with many real-world certificates and covered several edge cases where competitors fall short.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Share your experience with using Warrant and Cert Decoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I think one major difference between the Zanzibar implementations that are out there is support for the 'zookie' consistency token (as mentioned in the original paper). OpenFGA afaik doesn't implement zookies yet[1]. With zookies, each... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Warrant — Hosted enterprise-grade authorization and access control service for your apps. The free tier includes 1 million monthly API requests and 1,000 authz rules. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The specific challenge with authz in the app layer is that different apps can have different access models with varying complexity, especially the more granular you get (e.g. Implementing fine grained access to specific objects/resources... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Why? Because I built certdecoder.com and couldn’t find a decent place to submit it. So I said screw it — I’ll build my own. With blackjack and hookers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing Warrant and Cert Decoder, you can also consider the following products.

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
Compare authzed to Warrant or Cert Decoder:

Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.
Compare Cerbos to Warrant or Cert Decoder:



