Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Waldo for Android VS TelemetryDeck

Compare Waldo for Android VS TelemetryDeck and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Waldo for Android logo Waldo for Android

No-code mobile testing that works

TelemetryDeck logo TelemetryDeck

Privacy-first lightweight analytics for apps
  • Waldo for Android Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10
  • TelemetryDeck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

TelemetryDeck is a new service that helps app and web developers improve their product by supplying immediate, accurate analytics data while users use your app. And the best part: It's all anonymized so your users' data stays private!

TelemetryDeck

$ Details
free โ‚ฌ9.0 / Monthly (700 000 signals per month included)
Platforms
iOS Android MacOS Web

Waldo for Android features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    Waldo provides a seamless integration process with Android applications, allowing developers to set up automated testing with minimal configuration.
  • Automated UI Testing
    Waldo specializes in automated UI testing, enabling developers to catch visual and functional bugs early in the development process without the need for writing code.
  • Visual Testing Interface
    Its visual testing interface allows developers and QA teams to understand how the app performs by seeing errors and bugs in a user-friendly manner.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    Waldo offers the ability to run tests in parallel, significantly reducing the time required to test large applications.
  • No-Code Platform
    By providing a no-code platform, Waldo makes it accessible for non-developers to create and maintain tests, broadening the testing capacity of any team.

Possible disadvantages of Waldo for Android

  • Limited Customization
    Waldo may not offer the same level of customization as code-based testing frameworks, limiting the ability to tailor tests to specific needs.
  • Dependency on Third-Party
    Relying on a third-party service for critical testing needs might not be feasible for all companies, due to privacy or security policies.
  • Learning Curve
    Even though it is a no-code platform, teams might face a learning curve transitioning from traditional testing methods to Waldo's unique setup.
  • Pricing
    Waldo's pricing model could be a con for smaller teams or startups with limited budgets, as costs can add up if extensive testing is needed.
  • Feature Limitations
    As a specialized tool, Waldo might not support all testing features available in more comprehensive testing suites, potentially necessitating additional tools.

TelemetryDeck features and specs

  • Privacy-First Analytics
  • Real-Time Insights
  • Insights
    UI Query Editor or hand-written

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Waldo for Android and TelemetryDeck)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Analytics
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Waldo for Android and TelemetryDeck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TelemetryDeck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Waldo for Android mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Waldo for Android yet. Tracking of Waldo for Android recommendations started around Mar 2021.

TelemetryDeck mentions (10)

  • Which analytics to use?
    You should try https://telemetrydeck.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Feedback on idea: Mobile analytics made simple and privacy-friendly
    I use TelemetryDeck, which seems like it could be a competitor. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Privacy and data collection in the BopQuiz app
    To know what the users are doing in my app, I added Analytics via TelemetryDeck. This is a small startup from Germany that takes privacy seriously. Source: over 2 years ago
  • The tech stack
    For tracking, I am using TelemetryDeck. Itโ€™s made by a small team here in Germany, has limited tracking and seems like a decent service. I only track things like what modes are used how often, so very limited information about the user. I am happy with the service so far. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What is ONE SaaS product NOT well known but deserves to be?
    I want to say TelemetryDeck for quick and easy analytics, but I'm highly biased :D~. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Waldo for Android and TelemetryDeck, you can also consider the following products

Firelab - Eliminate bugs with automated testing no-code required

Plausible.io - Plausible Analytics is a simple, open-source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics. Made and hosted in the EU, powered by European-owned cloud infrastructure ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

NativeTap.io - Test your mobile app across 100 real devices (pre-launch)

Simple Analytics - The privacy-first Google Analytics alternative located in Europe.

Autify for Mobile - Autify for Mobile is a no-code testing platform.

Fathom Analytics - Simple, trustworthy website analytics (finally)