
Sublime Text
Vim
Node.js
Notepad++
Microsoft Visual Studio
GitHub
IntelliJ IDEA
Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Pindrop Security
Resemble AI
Sumsub
TruePic
IDology
Onfido
Shufti
Diopter detects AI social engineering in real time on every video and voice call, stopping wire fraud, fake candidates, and help desk takeovers.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, VS Code seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1216 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | code.visualstudio.com | diopter.ai |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | Startup from the United States · 10 - 19 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of VS Code yet.
Diopter detects AI deepfakes and social engineering on live video and voice calls. What it does Diopter scores every participant on a call continuously, not only at the start, and turns four signals into one recommended action: Video deepfake detection: synthetic and manipulated video, scored per...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Diopter yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
My New Favorite Text Editor - Visual Studio Code
More videos
No Diopter videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing VS Code and Diopter.
Diopter's answer:
Diopter scores the live call, not a file after the fact. Most detection tools ask you to upload media and wait for a verdict. Diopter runs alongside a Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet or Webex call and scores every participant continuously for the full length of the call, including someone who is not speaking.
It also combines four signals rather than one. Video deepfake detection, audio deepfake detection, identity and payment verification, and policy alignment resolve into a single recommended action, so a security or finance team gets one decision rather than four dashboards.
The verdicts are deliberately honest. Bands are AI, mixed, clean and inconclusive, each with a confidence level rather than a flat yes or no. If a call could not be fully checked, Diopter reports that rather than defaulting to clean. It does not identify who is speaking, uses no voiceprints or enrollment, and never treats accent, region or language as a signal.
Diopter's answer:
Because the attack happens on the call, and that is where Diopter works.
Identity verification tools check a person once, usually at onboarding or account recovery. That does nothing for a wire approval call three months later where the person on screen is a deepfake. Single-frame or file-based detectors judge a moment of media rather than the conversation shaping the ask.
Diopter runs for the whole call and scores every participant continuously, on Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, and on VoIP and conference phone calls through Zoom Phone, Teams Phone, RingCentral and Dialpad. It combines synthetic media detection with identity and payment verification and policy alignment, then returns one recommended action.
It is also straightforward to deploy and clear about its limits. No caller-side install, works with a meeting bot or bot-free, on-prem and hybrid supported, configurable retention including zero data retention, and rollout through existing MDM such as Intune and Jamf. SOC 2 Type II in progress.
Diopter's answer:
Security and fraud teams at organisations where a phone or video call can move money, grant access or hire someone.
The people who buy and run it are CISOs and security operations, fraud operations, and IT. The people it protects usually sit elsewhere in the business: finance and treasury staff approving wires, accounts payable teams handling vendor payment changes, recruiters and hiring managers interviewing candidates, executive assistants fielding urgent requests, and IT help desk agents resetting credentials.
The common thread is a live conversation where someone is asking for something consequential and the only proof of who they are is their face or their voice.
Diopter's answer:
Diopter was founded in April 2026 by Rohan Gupta and Jeremy Pippin, after they watched generative AI move from productivity use cases into impersonation, fraud and social engineering.
Both came from QuillBot, where Rohan was founder and CEO of a generative AI company with more than 35 million monthly users, and Jeremy was VP of Product, having previously held the same role at FanDuel. They had spent years on the building side of generative AI and could see how cheap and scalable the attack had become while defence stayed expensive and manual.
The belief that shaped the product is that fraud is rarely detectable from a single frame or voice sample. It unfolds across a conversation, so the arc is the unit of analysis: authority, urgency, isolation, escalation and the ask, scored continuously through a live call.
The company is based in Chicago, Illinois.
Share your experience with using VS Code and Diopter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


If you're a Windows DBA who mainly manages servers, SSMS is still hard to beat. SQL Server Data Tools makes the most sense for teams building database projects in Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code with the MSSQL...
Visual Studio Code, commonly known as VS Code, is a powerful and extensible code editor developed by Microsoft. With its rich ecosystem of extensions and features like IntelliSense, debugging, and Git integration, VS...
Finally, the Visual Studio Code website has numerous tabs for you to learn about the software. The documentation page walks you through steps like the setup and working with different languages. You’re also able to...
We have no reviews of Diopter yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


While Visual Studio Code supports OpenType features for its code editor well, configuring those features can be complex as it relies on understanding related CSS syntax. On top of this, additional configuration may be required. Because... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
Visual Studio Code, a code editor created by Microsoft, was first introduced on April 29, 2015, at the Build conference. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
The step up from there is an editor with a built-in agent like Cursor, Google Antigravity, Windsurf, or VS Code with a coding extension. These are code editors with an AI agent living inside them, and the difference is the responsible... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Tracking Diopter since Sep 2026.
When comparing VS Code and Diopter, you can also consider the following products.

Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.
Compare Sublime Text to VS Code or Diopter:

Pindrop's call center software solutions help companies establish security, identity, & trust in call center voice interactions.
Compare Pindrop Security to VS Code or Diopter:

Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing
Compare Vim to VS Code or Diopter:

AI voice generator with voice cloning for text to speech.
Compare Resemble AI to VS Code or Diopter:

Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
Compare Node.js to VS Code or Diopter:

One verification platform to secure the whole user journey
Compare Sumsub to VS Code or Diopter: