VoteAlly's answer

Anyone that needs to run governance processes like corporate resolutions, annual meetings, and elections. (corporations, non-profits, associations, HOAs, condo boards, etc).

Emisar.dev's answer:

emisar is for SRE, DevOps, platform engineering, infrastructure, and security teams that want AI agents to inspect and operate production systems. It is especially relevant to teams managing multiple Linux hosts, clusters, databases, cloud services, or regulated environments where unrestricted shell access and incomplete audit records are unacceptable.

VoteAlly's answer

Typescript, postgress, node js

Emisar.dev's answer:

The hosted control plane and operator interface use Elixir, Phoenix, LiveView, PostgreSQL, and Tailwind CSS. The host runner and MCP bridge are written in Go. Action packs use YAML and JSON Schema, while production infrastructure is managed with Terraform on Google Cloud. The system communicates through MCP, OAuth 2.1, TLS, and WebSockets.

VoteAlly's answer

We do not list our customers without their express permission. As we get this consent, we will update here!

Emisar.dev's answer:

• Blitz.gg - game analytics for billions of matches and a pretty large infrastructure.

VoteAlly's answer

Having run a non-profit for 7 years, and having requirements for live voting during the annual meeting, the competitors out there were difficult to use and poorly designed. The business models revolved around having the software be confusing so you had to pay for their expensive and otherwise unnecessary managed services.

We knew there was no reason for this to be the case. VoteAlly was born to replace our competitors for internal use, then commercialized so that others may also benefit from our innovation.

Emisar.dev's answer:

Founder Andrii Dryga spent a decade working as a CTO, full-stack engineer, SRE, and DevOps engineer. He experienced the cost of running the wrong command on the wrong cluster, while also seeing AI solve operational problems in seconds. emisar grew from the need to preserve both truths: AI agents are useful, and production access must remain bounded. Its answer is to give agents a reviewed catalog of operations instead of a blank terminal.

VoteAlly's answer

Designed to be self-run, managed service are available but not the main value proposition. It is easy to use for both admins and voters.

Emisar.dev's answer:

emisar lets AI agents work on real infrastructure without giving them a shell. Agents choose from a finite catalog of typed, versioned actions. Policy decides what runs, what requires approval, and what is denied, while an outbound-only runner verifies the action again on the host. New capabilities arrive as packs behind the same MCP integration, and every request is recorded in both a searchable audit trail and a tamper-evident host journal. [

VoteAlly's answer

Easy to use, beautiful mobile experience for voters.

Emisar.dev's answer:

Choose emisar when you want an agent to keep investigating and handling routine operations without handing it SSH credentials or supervising every call. Compared with raw shell access, copy-paste workflows, or one-off MCP servers, emisar provides reviewed action contracts, host-level enforcement, risk-based policy, scoped access, approvals, pack integrity checks, and a durable audit trail. It is built specifically for governed infrastructure access rather than generic automation.