Software Alternatives & Startups

Vis VS PuTTY

Compare Vis VS PuTTY and see what are their differences

Vis

A vi-like editor based on Plan 9's structural regular expressions.

Rating
0 reviews
PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Vis seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 38 times since March 2021.

social mentions
38 vs 0
Text Editors popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
72 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Vis
PuTTY
Website github.com chiark.greenend.org.uk
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Vis 6 features
PuTTY 5 features
  • Efficiency
    Vis is designed to be a highly efficient, text-based editor that operates with low resource consumption, making it suitable for use on systems with limited hardware resources.
  • Modal Editing
    Inspired by Vim, Vis offers modal editing, which allows users to switch between different modes for inserting text and manipulating files, providing a powerful and efficient workflow.
  • Keyboard-centric Interface
    Vis, like Vim, emphasizes the use of keyboard shortcuts to navigate and edit text, which can lead to faster and more efficient text editing once mastered.
  • Configurable
    Vis is highly configurable, allowing users to customize and extend its functionalities to suit their specific needs and preferences.
  • Scripting Support
    Vis supports Lua scripting, which enables users to automate tasks and extend the editor's functionality with custom scripts.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project hosted on GitHub, Vis allows users to contribute to its development and customize the code to fit their needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Like other modal editors, Vis can be difficult for new users to learn, especially if they are accustomed to graphical editors or those without modal interfaces.
  • Limited Documentation
    Compared to more established editors like Vim, Vis has less extensive documentation and fewer tutorials, which can pose challenges for users attempting to learn or troubleshoot.
  • Smaller Community
    Vis has a smaller user community compared to editors like Vim and Emacs, which may result in less community support and fewer resources available online.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Being a relatively newer project, Vis lacks the extensive plugin ecosystem that other editors, such as Vim, offer, limiting the availability of ready-to-use extensions.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Currently, Vis might not be as well-supported on all operating systems or platforms, which can limit its usability for some users.
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Vis
PuTTY

No analysis of Vis yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Vis 3 videos + Add
PuTTY 3 videos + Add

Vis 35 Radom Review & Range Test

More videos

  • - Ending Explained! Locked Up (Vis A Vis: El Oasis) | Review | Netflix
  • - Polish Vis 35 - the best pistol of WWII?

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Vis
PuTTY
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
SSH
100% 100%
100% 100%
IDE
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Vis and PuTTY. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Vis no reviews yet
PuTTY no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Vis yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Vis 38 mentions
PuTTY 0 mentions
  • How do you use Vim in the era of AI?
    Moved on to vis a few years ago and never looked back to vim/neovim. Granted, it doesn't have all the sparkles of the former, but it's way leaner and snappier - and you can tell there's no ai in it. https://github.com/martanne/vis. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: An opinionated fork of micro, built for vibe coders who enjoy code
    > thicc — a fork of micro that's heavy on opinions, not bloat. > What is thicc? File browser. Editor. Terminal. AI tools. One vibe. I don't follow. That seems to be heavy on bloat. Or maybe I'm just happy with vis... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ad: An Adaptable Text Editor
    People should be aware of two related editors: https://anvil-editor.net/ is an editor more directly inspired by and similar to Acme (but makes no attempt to borrow from Vim). - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Vis and PuTTY

When comparing Vis and PuTTY, you can also consider the following products.

  • Micro

    Modern terminal-based text editor

    Compare Micro to Vis or PuTTY:

  • MobaXterm

    Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

    Compare MobaXterm to Vis or PuTTY:

  • Kakoune

    Vim inspired — Faster as in less keystrokes — Multiple selections — Orthogonal design

    Compare Kakoune to Vis or PuTTY:

  • KiTTY

    KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

    Compare KiTTY to Vis or PuTTY:

  • acme

    Acme is a powerful text editor, development environment and textual-user-interface platform...

    Compare acme to Vis or PuTTY:

  • ConEmu

    ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

    Compare ConEmu to Vis or PuTTY: