Software Alternatives & Startups

Violentmonkey VS WireMock

Compare Violentmonkey VS WireMock and see what are their differences

Violentmonkey

Violentmonkey is a userscript manager to support running userscripts in web pages.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
WireMock

WireMock - a web service test double for all occasions.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Violentmonkey should be more popular than WireMock. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.

social mentions
46 vs 23
Browser Extensions popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
30 vs 57

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Violentmonkey
WireMock
Website violentmonkey.github.io wiremock.org
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Violentmonkey 5 features
WireMock 4 features
  • Free and Open Source
    Violentmonkey is freely available to use and the source code is open for anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to. This ensures transparency and community-driven development.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and updated, which means that bugs are fixed promptly and new features are regularly added.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Violentmonkey is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Opera, providing flexibility to users regardless of their browser preference.
  • User Script Manager
    It allows users to manage and run custom scripts to enhance web pages, providing extensive customization options for a tailored browsing experience.
  • Easy Backup and Sync
    Features like backup and sync allow users to easily transfer their settings and scripts across different devices, ensuring a consistent experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with scripting, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to write and manage scripts effectively.
  • Security Risks
    As with any tool that runs third-party scripts, there is a potential risk for malicious scripts that can compromise user security and privacy if not properly vetted.
  • Dependency on Community Scripts
    The quality and functionality of Violentmonkey heavily rely on the availability and maintenance of user-submitted scripts, which can vary in quality.
  • Browser Performance Impact
    Running multiple or poorly optimized scripts can affect browser performance by increasing loading times and resource consumption.
  • Flexible API Mocking
    WireMock allows developers to create a wide range of mock APIs, including simulating different behaviors and responses, which helps in testing edge cases and handling different scenarios without needing the actual service.
  • Standalone and Embeddable
    WireMock can be run as a standalone server or embedded into a Java application, providing versatility in how it can be integrated and used within various development environments.
  • Rich Feature Set
    WireMock offers features like request verification, fault injection, and response templating, which make it a powerful tool for replicating real-world service behavior in test environments.
  • Community and Documentation
    WireMock is supported by a large community and comprehensive documentation, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and integrate it effectively into development processes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Java-Based Limitation
    WireMock is primarily a Java-based tool, which might not be ideal for teams not using Java, leading to additional setup and integration challenges for non-Java environments.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running WireMock, especially in complex scenarios or with a heavy load, can introduce performance overhead that might not be tolerable in all development environments, particularly in CI/CD pipelines.
  • Learning Curve
    Although WireMock is powerful, it has a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with its configuration and usage, potentially requiring considerable time to become proficient.
  • Limited Non-Standard Protocols
    WireMock is primarily designed for HTTP-based services, and may not be suitable out-of-the-box for mocking services that use non-standard or proprietary protocols, thus limiting its applicability in some scenarios.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Violentmonkey
WireMock

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Violentmonkey is a reliable and efficient userscript manager that caters to the needs of users who want to customize their web browsing experience.

Why this product is good

  • Violentmonkey is considered a good choice for users looking to manage userscripts on their web browsers. It provides a clean and straightforward interface, supports a wide range of script sources, and is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. Moreover, it is open-source, allowing for community contributions and transparency.

Recommended for

  • Tech-savvy users interested in enhancing their web browser functionality through userscripts.
  • Developers who want to test userscripts in a flexible environment.
  • Users looking for an open-source alternative to other popular script managers like Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey.

No analysis of WireMock yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Violentmonkey 1 video + Add
WireMock 1 video + Add

暴力猴 Violentmonkey chrome 神器扩展插件 看VIP电影 下载视频一应俱全

WireMock stand-alone by Ixchel Ruiz

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Violentmonkey
WireMock
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Violentmonkey and WireMock. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Violentmonkey 46 mentions
WireMock 23 mentions
  • Show HN: UserScript to manually choose model for ChatGPT website
    - GPT 4o mini, so you can save your 4o calls for more complex queries https://github.com/altbdoor/userscripts/raw/master/force-gpt3.user.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If your Firefox suddenly started to hang or become extremely slow today, check if you have tampermonkey 5.0. Disable it for now as it seems to be the culprit.
    Since Tampermonkey seems to be misbehaving, consider using Violentmonkey. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Current plan for the flag
    Step 1Install violentmonkey (or your favorite user script manager). Source: about 3 years ago

View more

  • Wiremock + testcontainers + Algolia + Go = ❤️
    On a new project, I decided to re-evaluate my options, and remembered a tool that seems to be the next best thing for the job: Wiremock. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Self-hostable webhook tester in go
    I'm pretty sure Wiremock (https://wiremock.org) lets you configure both the response body and headers. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The best way for testing outbound API calls
    Mocha is a lib inspired by nock and WireMock. It allows checking if the mock was called or not, which is a nice feature. Like httptest, it also it don't automatically intercept the requests. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Violentmonkey and WireMock

When comparing Violentmonkey and WireMock, you can also consider the following products.