Violentmonkey VS Promptfoo

• Free and Open Source
  Violentmonkey is freely available to use and the source code is open for anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to. This ensures transparency and community-driven development.
• Active Development
  The project is actively maintained and updated, which means that bugs are fixed promptly and new features are regularly added.
• Cross-Browser Support
  Violentmonkey is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Opera, providing flexibility to users regardless of their browser preference.
• User Script Manager
  It allows users to manage and run custom scripts to enhance web pages, providing extensive customization options for a tailored browsing experience.
• Easy Backup and Sync
  Features like backup and sync allow users to easily transfer their settings and scripts across different devices, ensuring a consistent experience.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For new users, especially those not familiar with scripting, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to write and manage scripts effectively.
• Security Risks
  As with any tool that runs third-party scripts, there is a potential risk for malicious scripts that can compromise user security and privacy if not properly vetted.
• Dependency on Community Scripts
  The quality and functionality of Violentmonkey heavily rely on the availability and maintenance of user-submitted scripts, which can vary in quality.
• Browser Performance Impact
  Running multiple or poorly optimized scripts can affect browser performance by increasing loading times and resource consumption.

• Open source and free to start
  Promptfoo is an open-source tool (MIT licensed) that can be installed and run locally via npm or npx at no cost, making it accessible to individual developers, startups, and teams without procurement hurdles.
• Declarative, config-driven testing
  Test cases, prompts, providers, and assertions are defined in simple YAML (or JSON/code) configuration files. This makes evaluations reproducible, easy to version-control, and straightforward to integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
• Broad model and provider support
  It supports many LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, AWS Bedrock, and local models such as Ollama, plus custom providers. This lets teams compare models and prompts side by side and avoid vendor lock-in.
• Built-in red teaming and security scanning
  Promptfoo includes automated red teaming and vulnerability scanning features for issues such as prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII leakage, and harmful content, helping teams assess LLM application safety before release.
• Local-first with rich assertions and comparison views
  Evaluations run locally, so prompts and data can stay private, and results can be explored in a web viewer with side-by-side comparisons. A wide set of assertion types, including deterministic checks, LLM-as-judge, similarity, and custom scripts, supports flexible evaluation.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning curve for advanced use
  Basic setups are simple, but advanced features such as custom providers, complex assertions, model-graded metrics, and red team configuration require a fair amount of reading documentation and experimentation.
• Config-heavy workflow can be limiting
  The YAML-centric approach may feel cumbersome for non-technical stakeholders or for highly dynamic, agentic, or multi-step workflows, which may require custom code or providers to evaluate well.
• LLM-as-judge cost and variability
  Model-graded assertions and red teaming can consume many API calls, which raises cost and can produce non-deterministic or biased grading results that need calibration and human review.
• Limited collaboration in the open-source version
  Team features such as shared dashboards, centralized results, access controls, and enterprise support are geared toward the paid or enterprise offering, so the free local tool can be less convenient for larger teams.
• Evaluation-focused rather than full observability
  Promptfoo is mainly for pre-deployment testing and security assessment. It is not a complete production monitoring or tracing platform, so teams often need additional tools for runtime observability and analytics.

No analysis of Promptfoo yet.

暴力猴 Violentmonkey chrome 神器扩展插件 看VIP电影 下载视频一应俱全

No Promptfoo videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

We have no reviews of Violentmonkey yet. Be the first one to post

• 10 Best Free AI Prompt Tools in 2026 (No Subscription Required)
  sureprompts.com · May 2026

  Promptfoo is an open-source command-line tool for testing and evaluating prompts. You define test cases in YAML — inputs, expected outputs, and assertions — and Promptfoo runs them against one or more models,...

• Show HN: UserScript to manually choose model for ChatGPT website

  - GPT 4o mini, so you can save your 4o calls for more complex queries https://github.com/altbdoor/userscripts/raw/master/force-gpt3.user.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• If your Firefox suddenly started to hang or become extremely slow today, check if you have tampermonkey 5.0. Disable it for now as it seems to be the culprit.

  Since Tampermonkey seems to be misbehaving, consider using Violentmonkey. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Current plan for the flag

  Step 1Install violentmonkey (or your favorite user script manager). Source: about 3 years ago

View more

• Stop shipping untested prompts: test your LLM prompts like code with promptfoo — hands-on

  Promptfoo (promptfoo.dev) is the open-source tool that fixes this: a CLI and library for test-driven LLM development. You define prompts, providers, and test cases in a YAML config, attach assertions to the outputs, and run promptfoo... - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago