Software Alternatives & Startups

Violentmonkey VS Codeship

Compare Violentmonkey VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Violentmonkey

Violentmonkey is a userscript manager to support running userscripts in web pages.

Violentmonkey Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Codeship Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Violentmonkey seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.

social mentions
46 vs 0
Browser Extensions popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
53 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Violentmonkey
Codeship
Website violentmonkey.github.io cloudbees.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Violentmonkey 5 features
Codeship 6 features
  • Free and Open Source
    Violentmonkey is freely available to use and the source code is open for anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to. This ensures transparency and community-driven development.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and updated, which means that bugs are fixed promptly and new features are regularly added.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Violentmonkey is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Opera, providing flexibility to users regardless of their browser preference.
  • User Script Manager
    It allows users to manage and run custom scripts to enhance web pages, providing extensive customization options for a tailored browsing experience.
  • Easy Backup and Sync
    Features like backup and sync allow users to easily transfer their settings and scripts across different devices, ensuring a consistent experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with scripting, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to write and manage scripts effectively.
  • Security Risks
    As with any tool that runs third-party scripts, there is a potential risk for malicious scripts that can compromise user security and privacy if not properly vetted.
  • Dependency on Community Scripts
    The quality and functionality of Violentmonkey heavily rely on the availability and maintenance of user-submitted scripts, which can vary in quality.
  • Browser Performance Impact
    Running multiple or poorly optimized scripts can affect browser performance by increasing loading times and resource consumption.
  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Violentmonkey
Codeship

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Violentmonkey is a reliable and efficient userscript manager that caters to the needs of users who want to customize their web browsing experience.

Why this product is good

  • Violentmonkey is considered a good choice for users looking to manage userscripts on their web browsers. It provides a clean and straightforward interface, supports a wide range of script sources, and is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. Moreover, it is open-source, allowing for community contributions and transparency.

Recommended for

  • Tech-savvy users interested in enhancing their web browser functionality through userscripts.
  • Developers who want to test userscripts in a flexible environment.
  • Users looking for an open-source alternative to other popular script managers like Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey.

No analysis of Codeship yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Violentmonkey 1 video + Add
Codeship 2 videos + Add

暴力猴 Violentmonkey chrome 神器扩展插件 看VIP电影 下载视频一应俱全

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Violentmonkey
Codeship
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Violentmonkey and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Violentmonkey no reviews yet
Codeship no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Violentmonkey yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Violentmonkey 46 mentions
Codeship 0 mentions
  • Show HN: UserScript to manually choose model for ChatGPT website
    - GPT 4o mini, so you can save your 4o calls for more complex queries https://github.com/altbdoor/userscripts/raw/master/force-gpt3.user.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If your Firefox suddenly started to hang or become extremely slow today, check if you have tampermonkey 5.0. Disable it for now as it seems to be the culprit.
    Since Tampermonkey seems to be misbehaving, consider using Violentmonkey. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Current plan for the flag
    Step 1Install violentmonkey (or your favorite user script manager). Source: about 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Codeship since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Violentmonkey and Codeship

When comparing Violentmonkey and Codeship, you can also consider the following products.