Vimeo Reviews

GitHub MCP Server Reviews

Vimeo mentions (61)

• Choosing a video hosting provider for hobby projects

  A new challenge I was presented with then was where to host the demo video. In the past I'd always reach for the quick and dirty solutions like hosting on Vimeo, YouTube's unlisted videos, or GitHub even. This time I decided it was time for change, I wanted to host my assets on my own infra. To do this I came up with two requirements: 1) The solution needs to be free/dirt cheap 2) The setup can't take more than... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Open Source Virtual Indoor Cycling Application (Now with Shiny GTK4/Adwaita GUI)

  - Project roadmap (https://github.com/users/richbl/projects/4) From the BSC wiki about where to find videos to use for cycling playback: "...look for videos that are first-person cycling, driving, or even running videos. Check out [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com), [Vimeo](https://vimeo.com), [Pexels](https://www.pexels.com/videos/), or [DailyMotion](https://www.dailymotion.com/us), and search for "first person... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Top 7 Free Unlimited Video Hosting Websites in 2023

  Vimeo, founded in 2004, offers a clean and ad-free platform for video hosting. The free plan gives you 5GB of storage per week to post up to 500 MB weekly. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Any tips to kick this out?

  I'm currently trying to popularize Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/ Vimeo is a great alternative to Youtube and really it's only downside is that is has very little users. Because Vimeo is just NOT a bunch of greedy assholes like Youtube, you can actually earn more on vimeo than on youtube in a lot of the cases. Although most people who would migrate to vimeo probably also use adblockers, It does have very few ads at... Source: almost 3 years ago

• Is there an "OR" option available for filters?

  One of the views is listed as "Videos" and it's filtered by "Source" and then "contains "vimeo.com". Source: about 3 years ago

GitHub MCP Server mentions (18)

• Do unused MCP tools cost you money?

  I have a small "GitHub summarizer" agent: one system prompt, one job — answer questions about my GitHub account by calling the GitHub MCP server. I duplicated its configuration (MAVERIK supports this directly — same model, same prompt, same everything) and changed one field on the copy: the set of attached MCP servers, adding deepwiki, microsoft-learn, and context7. Neither agent needs any of those three for the... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• Every API Will Be Rebuilt for Agents

  GitHub's official MCP server is excellent — and GitHub is narrowing its default toolset and consolidating PR tools into fewer, more capable ones, explicitly to cut tool bloat and improve agent reasoning. The implication is hard to miss: even one of the best API companies on the planet is learning that a 1:1 mapping from product API to agent tools isn't the right shape. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Your AI Agent Has Push Access to Every Repo

  The official GitHub MCP server registers 83 tools. Most people set it up for reading code and managing issues. What they don't realise is they've also handed their agent the keys to:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Helping Claude Do Its Best Work

  A lot of people use MCP servers to connect Claude to tools. I'm not generally a fan. MCP servers load a lot of information into context and often don't do everything that the API can. Last I looked, even the official Github MCP Server is guilty of this. I'd rather write tools directly, to my specifications. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Kiro showcase: Automating Changes Across Several Repos with Spec-Driven Development and Custom Sub-Agents

  Rather than manually searching through repositories, I used Kiro with the GitHub MCP server to:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago