After programming and compilation, you get a binary program image, which you can also analyse. Analysis at both source code and binary image stages is called static analysis. We already did static analysis, when going over program segments with readelf. A popular static analysis tool is valgrind. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Hello, as always: imho (!) I remember this incident - if my memory doesn't trick me: it was openssl which accessed memory it didn't allocated to collect randomness / entropy for key-generation. And valgrind complained about a possible memory-leak - its a profiling-tool with the focus on detecting memory-mgmt problems. * https://valgrind.org/ instead of taking a closer look / trying to understand what exactly went... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Odin has a builtin heap allocator that works the same way you would expect any other high-level language to do memory allocation–it's just that you have to free the memory yourself. Plus, Odin's built in `context` system makes it really easy to change what kind of allocator is used for different sections of code. For my use cases, I've never needed any more than a heap and an arena, detailed in this talk:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Dunno, who says a lot of effort was put into Rosetta 2? It's mostly something that was needed in the first few years so you could run Chrome and Photoshop, but those have been ported now. It's mostly useful for running WINE but that's not super common outside games. That said, a binary recompiler has a lot of uses once you have one: https://valgrind.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Valgrind is an open-source profiling tool suite ideal for debugging and profiling C and C++ applications. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

CIs like GitHub Actions provide a practical automation layer for teams that treat knowledge management as code. A workflow triggered on a schedule can query the KB's article index, cross-reference it against the last 30 days of ticket topic clusters, and output a coverage report to a Slack channel or a GitHub issue. Mintlify's documentation-as-code model shows what this looks like for developer documentation:... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

In this comparison, we examine four leading platforms: Theneo's AI-first approach with complete developer portals, Redocly's spec-governance excellence, ReadMe's content-centric hubs, and Mintlify's beautiful Git-native design. We'll evaluate each across critical dimensions—automation capabilities, collaboration workflows, agent discoverability, and pricing value—to help you find the perfect fit for your team's... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Let me be upfront: I didn't choose Mintlify. When I joined my current company as the first and only technical writer, the platform had already been selected. The documentation needed a complete overhaul, and Mintlify was what I had to work with. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Writing documentation is usually the task developers avoid until the last minute. Mintlify changes that by making documentation feel as smooth as writing code. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

Most of the technical and frontend documentation websites are either using github markdown pages or using a tool like mintlify. As a developer, documentation website are nothing much different than a content based platform and gitbook is among one of those popular list. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago