
OpenAI
Gemini.com
Tokensave.app
LLM Cost Calculator
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT3 Crush
OpenRouter
Estimate LLM API costs before you build — GPT-4, Claude, Gemini

Langfuse
LangChain
Helicone AI
Portkey
MarginDash
TokenCalculator.dev
AI cost tracking for developers: what every LLM request costs the moment it completes, by feature, model and customer. SDK, no proxy, prompts never stored.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | utilitylab.dev | llm-track.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Free browser-based tool to estimate API costs for GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and open-source models. Calculate prompt, completion, and monthly token expenses before writing code. No sign-up required. AI Cost Simulator helps developers and teams estimate LLM API pricing before they ship. Select from...
LLMtrack shows what every LLM request costs the moment it completes, broken down by product feature, model and customer. Each request is priced component by component, including cached, reasoning and audio tokens, across 420+ models from 12 providers, re-synced daily. See which customers cost...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing UtilityLab.dev and LLMtrack.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
Most LLM cost calculators are either spreadsheets or require signing up for an API. AI Cost Simulator is a free, browser-based tool that works instantly — no account, no installation, no data upload. It supports the widest range of models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, and more) with both per-call and monthly volume estimates in one view.
LLMtrack's answer:
It shows what every LLM request costs the moment it completes, broken down by feature and customer. Each request is priced component by component, across 422 models. Unknown models are flagged, never shown as $0. No proxy, no prompts stored.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
Vanilla JavaScript, HTML, and CSS — no frameworks, no bundlers. All cost calculations happen client-side. The tool is deployed as a static site on Cloudflare Pages for global low-latency access.
LLMtrack's answer:
Next.js, TypeScript, Vercel, Supabase (Postgres), Node.js and Python SDKs, OpenTelemetry.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
It's the only zero-friction cost estimator. Competitors either lock features behind sign-up walls, only support one model family, or require you to dig through separate pricing pages. AI Cost Simulator gives you a side-by-side comparison of all major LLM providers in one page — and everything runs locally in your browser, so your pricing data never leaves your machine.
LLMtrack's answer:
Most tools trace what your AI calls did. LLMtrack tells you which feature and which customer is costing you money, and what to change. Setup is one SDK call. The free plan includes every feature.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
Developers, indie hackers, and technical founders who are evaluating LLM APIs for their next project. Also product managers and engineering leads doing cost analysis before committing to a model provider at scale.
LLMtrack's answer:
Developers and small SaaS teams shipping AI features who get a provider's bill and can't tell which feature or customer caused it.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
When building AI-powered features, we realized every model provider publishes pricing differently — per-token, per-character, per-request — and there's no single place to compare them. Instead of bookmarking five pricing pages and building a spreadsheet, we built a dead-simple comparison tool. We open-sourced the approach and made it free so other developers don't have to waste time doing manual math.
LLMtrack's answer:
My OpenAI bill was one number. I wanted to know which feature spent it, so I built a small logger. By cost it was the code feature. By tokens it was the summarizer. Watching tokens alone would have blamed the wrong one.
UtilityLab.dev's answer
Since it's a free browser tool with no sign-up, we don't track individual users. It's used by developers and teams evaluating LLM costs across startups, agencies, and enterprise engineering teams.
Share your experience with using UtilityLab.dev and LLMtrack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing UtilityLab.dev and LLMtrack, you can also consider the following products.


Langfuse is an open-source LLM engineering platform that helps teams collaboratively debug, analyze, and iterate on their LLM applications.
Compare Langfuse to UtilityLab.dev or LLMtrack:

Buy bitcoin and crypto instantly! Gemini is a simple and secure* platform to build your crypto portfolio.
Compare Gemini.com to UtilityLab.dev or LLMtrack:

Framework for building applications with LLMs through composability
Compare LangChain to UtilityLab.dev or LLMtrack:

Free AI token counter and cost calculators: tokens and API cost for GPT, Claude and Gemini, subscription vs API, coding agents. Private, no sign-up.
Compare Tokensave.app to UtilityLab.dev or LLMtrack:

Open-source LLM Observability for Developers
Compare Helicone AI to UtilityLab.dev or LLMtrack: