Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

userinput.io VS Qameta.io

Compare userinput.io VS Qameta.io and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

userinput.io logo userinput.io

Get on-demand feedback for your app, website or idea. Learn how to improve by hearing real opinions.

Qameta.io logo Qameta.io

Level up your product quality control and boost your QA and development team productivity by setting your TestOps.
  • userinput.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-04
  • Qameta.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

userinput.io features and specs

  • Affordable Pricing
    userinput.io offers a cost-effective way to gather user feedback, making it accessible for small businesses and startups.
  • Real-User Feedback
    Provides genuine insights from actual users, which can help in understanding the user experience more accurately.
  • Quick Turnaround
    Delivers feedback in a timely manner, which is crucial for rapid iteration and development.
  • Video Recordings
    Offers video feedback from users, providing a clear visual and auditory context for their comments and opinions.
  • Customization Options
    Allows customization of questions and tasks, enabling you to gather specific information that is relevant to your project.

Possible disadvantages of userinput.io

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Might lack some advanced features that more comprehensive user testing platforms offer, such as in-depth analytics or heatmaps.
  • Dependent on User Pool
    The quality and relevance of feedback can vary depending on the specific users selected for the task.
  • Not Suitable for Large-Scale Testing
    Might not be ideal for large-scale user testing or highly complex projects that require extensive analysis.
  • Potential Bias
    Feedback can be influenced by the subjective opinions of a limited user group, which may not represent the broader target audience.
  • No In-Person Interaction
    Lacks the ability to interact with users in real-time, which can be beneficial for probing deeper into specific issues.

Qameta.io features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of userinput.io

Overall verdict

  • Overall, userinput.io is considered a useful service for those looking to gather actionable feedback from real users. The platform is generally well-regarded for its straightforward approach and the quality of feedback provided.

Why this product is good

  • Userinput.io is a platform designed to provide businesses and individuals with feedback on websites, apps, and ideas from real users. It can be a valuable tool for gaining customer insights, improving user experience, and identifying potential issues through unbiased feedback.

Recommended for

  • Entrepreneurs launching a new product or service
  • Developers looking to improve user experience
  • Designers needing feedback on design and usability
  • Product managers seeking customer insights
  • Businesses looking to validate ideas before implementation

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to userinput.io and Qameta.io)
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Usability
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using userinput.io and Qameta.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Qameta.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

userinput.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of userinput.io yet. Tracking of userinput.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Qameta.io mentions (4)

  • Defect Management Tools List for 2025 (Free, Paid, & Open Source)
    9. Allure TestOps (Paid, Open Source) Allure TestOps combines defect and test management, allowing teams to collaborate on test planning and monitoring. It has a paid and open-source version, and itโ€™s popular among development teams seeking high adaptability and performance insights. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Playwright test report tracking
    You two are probably talking about two different things. What's expensive is the whole commercial Allure TestOps product (https://qameta.io). But the Allure Report (aka Allure Framework, at https://github.com/allure-framework/allure2) is free. Source: over 2 years ago
  • qameta software
    Allure TestOps was created to help developer teams build software quality across the DevOps pipeline. What tools are needed to gain full control over quality? How does it work in real life? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Allure TestOps Cloud General Availability
    Allure TestOps brings full control over testing infrastructure with dozens of native integrations with the most common testing and CI/CD tools: create, execute, monitor, analyze and get insights in a single tool. With Cloud, development teams may benefit from its powers in no time. Check out the product page for more details. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing userinput.io and Qameta.io, you can also consider the following products

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.

Report Portal - AI-powered Test Automation Dashboard

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

Tricentis - Tricentis Tosca is an effective end-to-end testing suite for enterprises, providing functional software testing tools.

UserTest.io - User testing made simple. High-quality, affordable user testing solutions from real users, here in the UK. Improve your usability!

Backlog - Built for teams that move fast โ€” Backlog is the all-in-one project management solution with exactly what you need, and nothing you donโ€™t.