
ScreenshotOne
ApiFlash
ScreenshotAPI.net
Screenshot Machine
HTMLCSS to Image API
URL2PNG
Stillio
Screenshot full page websites in retina resolution with Urlbox.io screenshot as a service API. Urlbox is the best provider of automated website screenshots offering many unique options and features.

supastarter
ShipFa.st
NextBase
Nexty.dev
MkSaaS
GetCreator.dev
SaaSykit
SaaS starter kits for Next.js, TanStack Start, and React Router on Supabase, Drizzle, or Prisma. Teams, billing, and AGENTS.md + MCP for coding agents.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Urlbox should be more popular than Makerkit.dev. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | urlbox.com | makerkit.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2013 | Startup from Singapore · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Urlbox yet.
Makerkit is a SaaS starter kit for building multi-tenant B2B apps in TypeScript. Kits are available for Next.js and TanStack Start on Supabase, Drizzle, or Prisma, and for React Router on Supabase. The Drizzle and Prisma kits use Better Auth and run on any Postgres database. Every kit includes...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Urlbox yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Urlbox and Makerkit.dev.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Indie Hackers and Companies who want to launch quickly, without compromising on quality.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit uses Next.js 15 (App Router), Supabase, React.js, Typescript and Stripe.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit stands out by offering a truly modular architecture built with Turborepo, where core features like auth, billing, and notifications live in their own packages for better maintainability.
While most starters lock you into specific patterns or providers, Makerkit gives you flexibility with a multi-account system supporting both B2B and B2C scenarios, provider-agnostic billing, and edge-ready deployment options.
Beyond the basics, it includes production-ready features like multi-factor auth, real-time notifications, and team permissions - all built with Supabase, TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling to make development a genuine pleasure.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
While other starters give you basic auth and a dashboard, Makerkit provides a genuinely modular foundation with the real features SaaS products need - like multi-factor auth, team permissions, real-time notifications, and provider-agnostic billing, all organized in clean, maintainable packages using Turborepo.
You get a first-class developer experience with TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling, plus the flexibility to support both B2B and B2C scenarios, different payment providers, and edge deployment options.
Best of all, Makerkit is actively maintained with regular updates and responsive support, so you're building on a foundation that grows with your needs rather than painting yourself into a corner.
Share your experience with using Urlbox and Makerkit.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Urlbox maintains an official MCP server (@urlbox/screenshot-mcp, a render Tool that returns PNG/PDF/MP4 plus HTML/metadata, env SECRET_KEY). Its differentiator is Forensic-grade output: cryptographic timestamps and hashes, change... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Picking a screenshot API feels binary until you start integrating, then the edges show: one service has a Python SDK but no async queue, another has webhooks but charges extra for authenticated pages, a third makes you wire up an S3... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
If you’re worried about the security risks, edge cases, maintenance pain and scaling challenges of self hosting there are various solid hosted alternatives: - https://browserless.io - low level browser control - https://scrapingbee.com -... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Price: $299 (Pro, individual) / $599 (Teams, 5 collaborators) - one-time, lifetime access URL: makerkit.dev. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
I saw these ones mentioned in an HN comment: - https://achromatic.dev - https://makerkit.dev - https://www.spirokit.com/ - https://saasykit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
When comparing Urlbox and Makerkit.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Fast and reliable screenshot API built to handle millions of screenshots a month.
Compare ScreenshotOne to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev:

The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.
Compare supastarter to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev:

ApiFlash is a powerful serverless screenshot API built with Chromium and AWS Lambda. It can easily scale to millions of screenshots per day and has an ever growing number of satisfied big clients.
Compare ApiFlash to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev:

The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.
Compare ShipFa.st to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev:

Generate beautiful website screenshots using our fast website screenshot API.
Compare ScreenshotAPI.net to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev:

Built your SAAS quickly and skip the boring parts
Compare NextBase to Urlbox or Makerkit.dev: