Software Alternatives & Startups

UrBackup VS CloudLinux

Compare UrBackup VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

UrBackup

UrBackup is a open source client/server backup system, that through a combination of image and file...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, UrBackup seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
File Sharing And Backup popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

UrBackup
CloudLinux
Website urbackup.org cloudlinux.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

UrBackup 6 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Open Source
    UrBackup is open source, which means it is free to use and anyone can contribute to its development. This allows for continuous improvement and transparency.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    UrBackup supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility for diverse environments.
  • Incremental Backups
    The software utilizes both incremental file and image backups, which saves storage space and reduces backup times.
  • Web-Based Management Interface
    UrBackup offers a web-based interface for managing backups, providing a user-friendly and accessible way to monitor and configure the system.
  • Client and Server Versions
    The software provides both client and server versions, which can scale to different use cases, from single-user setups to larger organizational needs.
  • Fast and Efficient
    UrBackup is designed for speed, leveraging efficient algorithms to ensure that backups do not consume unnecessary resources or time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup can be complex for users who are not familiar with backup systems or lack technical expertise.
  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, UrBackup may not have the robust customer support offered by commercial solutions, leading to potential challenges in troubleshooting.
  • Documentation
    While comprehensive, the documentation might not be as user-friendly or as detailed as that of some commercial backup solutions.
  • Advanced Features
    Lacks some advanced features found in competing commercial backup solutions, such as extensive cloud integration and advanced data deduplication.
  • Backup Performance
    In some cases, the performance may lag behind more optimized proprietary backup solutions, especially in large-scale deployments.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

UrBackup
CloudLinux

No analysis of UrBackup yet.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

UrBackup 3 videos + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

Best CRASHPLAN alternatives TESTED 2017 (Veeam, Urbackup, Macrium)

More videos

  • - urbackup on Windows 10 & Windows Server 2019
  • - Full PC Image Backup with Raspberry pi / UrBackup

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
UrBackup
CloudLinux
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using UrBackup and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

UrBackup no reviews yet
CloudLinux no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CloudLinux yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

UrBackup 2 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • Open Source Backup Application Linux/Raspbian Advice
    I'm currently using Urbackup (urbackup.org) which worked great on my windows server, but I made the switch to linux recently (command line only) and Urbackup seems to crash every few minutes/hours. I'm looking for everyone else's... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Local data backups on Linux?
    If you want client/server backups, urbackup is the easiest thing I've found. Does image-based backups for Windows, supports several snapshot options for Linux filesystems, and they have a Mac agent in beta. Source: about 5 years ago

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to UrBackup and CloudLinux

When comparing UrBackup and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.