Uppy VS Ember-cli

• Ease of Use
  Uppy provides a user-friendly interface, making it simple for users of all technical levels to upload and manage files efficiently.
• Modular Architecture
  Uppy is designed with a modular architecture, allowing developers to pick and choose plugins and features according to their specific needs.
• Multiple Source Support
  Uppy supports file uploads from various sources including local disk, remote URLs, cloud storage services such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Instagram.
• Real-time Progress
  The library provides real-time upload progress indicators, which improve the user experience by keeping users informed about their upload status.
• Resumable Uploads
  Uppy supports resumable file uploads, allowing users to resume interrupted uploads rather than starting over from scratch.
• Community and Documentation
  Uppy has an active community and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and integrate it into their projects.
• Open Source
  Uppy is an open-source project, which means it can be freely used and modified, and benefits from contributions from developers around the world.

Possible disadvantages

• File Size Limitations
  Depending on your backend and configuration, there may be limitations on the maximum file size that can be uploaded using Uppy.
• Complexity for Advanced Use Cases
  For more advanced use cases, such as integrating custom storage backends or complex workflows, Uppy can become complex and might require significant configuration and customization.
• Dependency Management
  Uppy has multiple plugins and dependencies, which can make managing updates and compatibility more challenging for developers.
• Browser Compatibility
  While Uppy supports most modern browsers, some older or less common browsers may have compatibility issues or require polyfills.
• Performance Overhead
  The modular nature and extensive feature set can introduce some performance overhead, particularly for large-scale or high-traffic applications.
• Learning Curve
  Although Uppy is designed to be user-friendly, there can be a learning curve for developers new to the library, especially when dealing with its more advanced features.
• Limited Built-in Security Features
  Uppy does not provide built-in security features like file scanning for malware or deep authentication mechanisms, requiring developers to implement additional security measures.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Review do Inalador/Nebulizador Uppy

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Ask HN: How to handle user file uploads?

  Look at https://uppy.io/ open source and lot of integrations. You can keep moving to different levels of abstraction as required and see some good practices of how things are done. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Pre-made solution for allowing a client to upload a file to my web hosting (via browser, not FTP client)?

  I just found uppy. This will be the next one I use. https://uppy.io/. Source: about 3 years ago

• BEST way to upload images to AWS from Next?

  I’m building a photo sharing website and want to make it incredibly easy to upload photos. Of course I could just utilize AWS official packages but that’s pretty bare bones. I could also use next-s3-upload which is purpose built for Next... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago