Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UnitJS VS Jasmine

Compare UnitJS VS Jasmine and see what are their differences

UnitJS logo UnitJS

Unit testing framework for Javascript

Jasmine logo Jasmine

Behavior-Driven JavaScript
  • UnitJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-21
  • Jasmine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

UnitJS features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing Features
    UnitJS provides a wide range of assertions and utilities for unit testing, making it easy to test code thoroughly.
  • Fluent Interface
    The library offers a fluent interface that allows for chaining of assertions, creating more readable and expressive tests.
  • Compatibility
    UnitJS is compatible with various JavaScript testing frameworks, which makes it flexible to integrate into different testing environments.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The UnitJS website offers extensive and clear documentation, helping developers quickly understand how to implement and use the library effectively.

Possible disadvantages of UnitJS

  • Limited Community Support
    UnitJS might not have as large a community as more popular testing libraries, which could mean fewer community resources and third-party tutorials.
  • Potential Overhead
    Using a comprehensive library like UnitJS may introduce additional overhead in terms of learning curve and resource usage compared to simpler assertion libraries.
  • Infrequent Updates
    The library may not receive updates as frequently as some other testing libraries, potentially affecting its compatibility with the latest JavaScript features.
  • Niche Use
    Given its extensive feature set, UnitJS might be overkill for smaller projects or developers looking for minimalistic testing solutions.

Jasmine features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development
    Jasmine is designed for BDD, which makes tests easier to understand and maintain, aligning well with modern development practices.
  • No Dependencies
    Jasmine does not require a DOM and has no dependencies, which simplifies initial setup and integration into various environments.
  • Comprehensive API
    Jasmine provides a rich set of matchers, spies, and utilities out of the box, making it easier to write complex tests.
  • Built-in Mocking
    Jasmine includes built-in features for spying and mocking functions, reducing the need for additional libraries.
  • Wide Adoption
    Jasmine is widely adopted in the industry, which means better community support, extensive documentation, and plentiful resources.
  • Framework Agnostic
    Jasmine can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, offering flexibility for different projects.

Possible disadvantages of Jasmine

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Users new to BDD or Jasmine might find its extensive API and different testing paradigms challenging to learn initially.
  • Async Testing Complexity
    Although Jasmine provides support for asynchronous tests, handling async code can still be complex and less intuitive compared to some other testing frameworks.
  • Verbose Syntax
    Writing tests in Jasmine can sometimes be more verbose compared to other testing libraries, potentially leading to longer, harder-to-read test files.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to some other testing frameworks like Jest, Jasmine has a more limited ecosystem of plugins and extensions.
  • Integration with ES Modules
    Jasmine's integration with modern JavaScript features like ES Modules can sometimes be less straightforward, requiring additional configuration or workarounds.

Analysis of Jasmine

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Jasmine is a good testing framework, particularly for those who want a straightforward, standalone solution for testing JavaScript. Its mature ecosystem and active community support make it a reliable choice.

Why this product is good

  • Jasmine is a popular behavior-driven development framework for testing JavaScript code. It is praised for being easy to set up and having no external dependencies, which makes it a great tool for testing purposes. Jasmine provides a clean syntax that makes tests readable and maintainable. It supports a variety of testing scenarios, including asynchronous testing and mock functionality, which are essential in modern web development.

Recommended for

  • JavaScript developers looking for a BDD framework.
  • Projects where ease of integration and minimal configuration are desired.
  • Development teams who prioritize readable and maintainable test code.
  • Those who need a robust solution for testing both synchronous and asynchronous code.

UnitJS videos

No UnitJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Jasmine videos

Blue Jasmine - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Blue Jasmine -- Movie Review
  • Review - Was Jasmine Ever Speechless? [Aladdin 2019 Review]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UnitJS and Jasmine)
Developer Tools
24 24%
76% 76
Testing
24 24%
76% 76
Debugging
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using UnitJS and Jasmine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UnitJS and Jasmine

UnitJS Reviews

We have no reviews of UnitJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Jasmine Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
In the State of JS ranking, Cypress has already surpassed some previously leading best testing frameworks, such as Jasmine, and is now ranked fourth for testing, with 35.8% of testers citing Cypress as their preferred testing framework, which is nearly identical to Mocha.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jasmine seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UnitJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of UnitJS yet. Tracking of UnitJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Jasmine mentions (32)

  • Angular vs. React vs. Vue
    Apart from that, there is a lot of common ground regarding testing. All three contenders support the testing tools that many of you use and love, whether it is Jest, Jasmine, and Mocha for unit testing or Cypress, Playwright, and โ€” of course โ€” Selenium for end-to-end testing, among others. A shallow learning curve will be ahead if you want to use these testing tools. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Test Test Test
    Greetings, another week another lab this week covered the topic of automated testing. When selecting a test framework my first thought was to use Jasmine, which I had used previously, however it turns out that Jasmine does not have good support for ES modules. After doing a bit of research I opted to go with Vitest, since it was ES module compatible, and was inter-compatible with the very popular Vite tool chain. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Is the VCR plugged in? Common Sense Troubleshooting For Web Devs
    5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • # 5 Testing Frameworks for JavaScript Developers
    Jasmine is renowned for its simplicity and is a popular choice for JavaScript testing. Here are its key features:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    Vitest makes it effortless to migrate from Jest. It supports the same Jasmine like API. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UnitJS and Jasmine, you can also consider the following products

Tree.js - Tree - The best unit testing framework for JavaScript!

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

TriCo - ๏ปฟThis App Converts your correctly formatted Excel Spreadsheet to a specified table/collection in specified Database in MYSQL/MongoDB.Supported Excel formats are XLS/XLSX/CSV.Windows/Linux/Mac OS all are supported.

QUnit - What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Mochajs - Mocha is a JavaScript test framework running on Node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple.

Jasmine Given - Like rspec-given, but for jasmine