Software Alternatives & Startups

unDraw VS react-testing-library

Compare unDraw VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

unDraw

Open-source illustrations for every project you can imagine and create.

Rating
0 reviews
react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, react-testing-library should be more popular than unDraw. It has been mentioned 138 times since March 2021.

social mentions
71 vs 138
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 78

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

unDraw
react-testing-library
Website undraw.co testing-library.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

unDraw 6 features
react-testing-library 5 features
  • Free to Use
    unDraw offers a wide range of illustrations for free, making it accessible for anyone without budget constraints.
  • Customizable Colors
    Users can easily change the color of any illustration to match their brand's color palette.
  • No Attribution Required
    The platform allows users to utilize the illustrations without the need to give credit, which is great for commercial projects.
  • High Quality
    The illustrations are of high quality, professional, and modern, making them suitable for various applications.
  • Broad Range of Topics
    unDraw covers a wide array of categories and topics, making it easier to find relevant illustrations.
  • Ease of Use
    The website interface is user-friendly, allowing for quick searches and easy downloads of illustrations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Styles
    Although high-quality, the illustrations have a uniform style, which might not fit every brand's aesthetic.
  • No Custom Illustrations
    Users cannot request custom illustrations directly from the platform, limiting personalized options.
  • Dependence on Updates
    Users rely on the platform to update and add new illustrations periodically, which may not always meet evolving trends or needs.
  • No Source Files
    Illustrations are only available in SVG format, which might be limiting for more advanced design modifications requiring source files.
  • Requires Internet Access
    An active internet connection is required to browse and download illustrations, which may not be convenient for all users.
  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

unDraw
react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • unDraw is a highly recommended resource for individuals and teams looking for high-quality illustrations. Its combination of ease of use, free licensing, and a wide variety of illustrations makes it a valuable tool for many creatives and developers.

Why this product is good

  • unDraw is a platform that offers a wide range of open-source illustrations that are customizable and can be used in various projects without any attribution or cost. It is praised for its beautiful, modern, and versatile designs that can enhance the visual appeal of websites, applications, and presentations. Additionally, the illustrations are SVG-based, making them easily scalable and editable to fit the needs of any project.

Recommended for

  • Web designers looking to incorporate visually appealing illustrations
  • Developers needing scalable graphics for projects
  • Marketing teams creating visually rich presentations
  • Content creators who want graphics that can be customized to match their brand's style
  • Educators needing visual aids for teaching materials

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

unDraw 2 videos + Add
react-testing-library 2 videos + Add

Adobe XD Landing Page Design Tutorial with unDraw

More videos

  • - UnDraw - Free Illustrations for Designers and Developers

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos

  • - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
unDraw
react-testing-library
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using unDraw and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

unDraw 71 mentions
react-testing-library 138 mentions

View more

  • Moving from Angular to React: A Practical Guide
    Testing Library. React Testing Library. https://testing-library.com/docs/react-testing-library/intro/. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • Test-Driven Development for Building User Interfaces
    React Testing Library’s core philosophy is that we should write our tests in such a way that we simulate user behavior. By testing what the user can actually do, our tests focus less on implementation details and more on the actual user... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Chaos-Driven Testing for Full Stack Apps: Integration Tests That Break (and Heal)
    In the main branch, we set up Vitest as the test runner and React Testing Library for rendering the component and simulating user interactions. We also set up MSW to intercept the network requests and return mock responses. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to unDraw and react-testing-library

When comparing unDraw and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products.