
CircleBoom
TweetExporter
twitterapi.io
Xtract Replies
ExportData.io
TweetFeast
SocialData Tools
X/Twitter analytics, follower data, and bot detection

Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | twtdata.com | foambubble.github.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


twtData is a Twitter/X data export and analytics tool for marketing teams, agencies, sales teams, recruiters and academic researchers. What you can do Download any public account's followers or following list to CSV: per-record pricing that drops for large accounts, with the exact price shown...
No description of Foam yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No twtData videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using twtData and Foam. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking twtData since Mar 2023.
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
When comparing twtData and Foam, you can also consider the following products.

Twitter user analytics, follower insight, social media manager, Delete tweets, Twitter account search, Facebook, Linkedin, Google my Business, Instagram Schedule and Publish Tool. Social media planner, social media scheduler
Compare CircleBoom to twtData or Foam:

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to twtData or Foam:

TweetExporter turns any public Twitter/X data into a clean spreadsheet. Export follower and following lists, a profile's tweets, or every tweet matching a search query and date range. Download as CSV, Excel or JSON. Buy credits once and pay per row
Compare TweetExporter to twtData or Foam:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to twtData or Foam:

Reliable Twitter API Alternative | Access Twitter data at scale without limits. Our enterprise-grade API offers unlimited data access, better pricing, and higher rate limits than Twitter's official API. Perfect for businesses needing mass data.
Compare twitterapi.io to twtData or Foam:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to twtData or Foam: