TweetAPI VS Surfer

• API Coverage
  82 documented REST endpoints for profiles, posts, search, followers, lists, communities, Spaces, interactions, and DMs.
• Pay as you go
  From $5 for 10,000 requests ($0.0005 per request), no subscription. Subscribers can top up anytime.
• Batch lookups
  Up to 50 profiles or 200 posts per request.
• Payments
  Card or crypto.
• Authentication
  API-key authentication with JSON responses and cursor-based pagination.
• Free Trial
  100 one-time API requests with no credit card required.
• Python SDK
  Maintained Python client with pagination, retries, rate-limit handling, and structured errors.
• Node.js SDK
  Maintained Node.js and TypeScript client with pagination, retries, and typed errors.
• Hosted MCP
  OAuth-protected agent access to current docs and public-data tools at mcp.tweetapi.com.
• Service Status
  Public uptime, response-time, and incident history.

• User-Friendly Interface
  Surfer provides a clean and intuitive web interface which makes it easy for users to upload, manage, and share files effortlessly.
• Self-Hosted
  Being a self-hosted solution, Surfer gives users full control over their data, ensuring that sensitive information is kept private and secure.
• Open Source
  Surfer is open source, allowing users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, thereby fostering community collaboration and transparency.
• Integrated Authentication
  Surfer supports Cloudron’s authentication system, providing seamless user management and secure access to the application.
• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  The application is built to work smoothly across various platforms and devices, enhancing accessibility and usability.

Possible disadvantages

• Dependency on Cloudron
  Surfer’s integration with Cloudron can be a limitation for users who do not utilize Cloudron, potentially adding an extra layer of dependency.
• Limited Advanced Features
  Compared to some commercial file-sharing and management tools, Surfer may lack certain advanced features and customizations.
• Resource Requirement
  As a self-hosted solution, running Surfer requires server resources, making it less ideal for users with limited server capacity or technical expertise.
• Initial Setup and Maintenance
  Setting up and maintaining Surfer might require a basic understanding of server management and Linux commands, posing a challenge for novice users.
• Scalability Concerns
  While suitable for small to medium setups, Surfer might face scalability issues when handling a large number of users and files.

No analysis of TweetAPI yet.

No TweetAPI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Pro Surfer Reviews Surf Movies, from 'Blue Crush' to 'Point Break' | Vanity Fair

More videos

• Best Twitter API Alternatives in 2026: 5 Providers Compared
  tweetapi.com · Sep 2026

  const xFitsMonthlyCap = callsByCycle.every((n) => n * postsPerCall <= 3_000_000); return { calls, posts, tweetapiUnits: calls, // Normal reads only: one unit each. tweetapiPayg: fundTweetApi(0, 0, 60),...

We have no reviews of Surfer yet. Be the first one to post

Tracking TweetAPI since Aug 2026.

• How to host a static website on Kubernetes with Nginx Ingress?

  I used Surfer for a little while to do static file hosting on Digital Ocean K8s. Set the backend file hosting up on spaces, with nginx as the ingress. Source: about 4 years ago