Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TruFont VS Input Mono

Compare TruFont VS Input Mono and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

TruFont logo TruFont

TruFont is a font-editing application written with Python3, ufoLib, defcon and PyQt5.

Input Mono logo Input Mono

Multiform monospace font.
  • TruFont Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-24
  • Input Mono Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

TruFont features and specs

  • Open Source
    TruFont is open source, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a collaborative environment and allows developers to tailor it to their specific needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    TruFont is compatible with multiple operating systems, allowing users on different platforms to use the software seamlessly.
  • Community Support
    The open-source nature encourages a supportive community that can provide assistance, share plugins, and contribute to the software's development.
  • Customizable UI
    The user interface can be customized to better fit the workflow preferences of different users.

Possible disadvantages of TruFont

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some commercial font design tools, TruFont may lack some advanced features and tools that professional typographers might need.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are accustomed to commercial font design software may experience a learning curve adapting to TruFont's interface and functionality.
  • Community-Driven Development
    Being open-source, the development depends on community contributions, which might lead to slower updates and fewer resources compared to commercial alternatives.
  • Documentation
    The documentation may not be as comprehensive or regularly updated as it is for commercial software, potentially making it harder for new users to get started.

Input Mono features and specs

  • Legibility
    Input Mono is designed with a focus on clear distinguishability of characters, which enhances reading comfort, especially for coding where character misidentification can lead to errors.
  • Customization
    The font offers extensive customization options, allowing users to adjust weight, width, and line height among other features, to suit personal preferences or specific requirements.
  • Open-source Availability
    Input Mono is available under an open-source license, making it freely accessible for modification and integration into various projects without licensing issues.
  • Technical Design
    It has been designed specifically for users working in technical environments, with glyphs that support programming and eliminate common confusion with similar-looking characters.

Possible disadvantages of Input Mono

  • Complexity of Choices
    The many customization options can be overwhelming, especially for users who prefer a simple, ready-to-use font, or those who find the selection process tedious.
  • Aesthetic Preference
    While the font is technically optimized, its aesthetic might not appeal to everyone, especially those who prioritize style or visual design over practicality in their font choice.
  • Web font Support
    Some users may experience challenges when integrating Input Mono as a web font, potentially requiring additional steps to ensure full compatibility across different browsers.

TruFont videos

No TruFont videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Input Mono videos

Exploring Monospaced Fonts: A Fontribute of Input Mono

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TruFont and Input Mono)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Typography
0 0%
100% 100
Image Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0
Design
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TruFont and Input Mono. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Input Mono seems to be a lot more popular than TruFont. While we know about 36 links to Input Mono, we've tracked only 2 mentions of TruFont. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TruFont mentions (2)

  • Hobbyist starting out, looking for program/tools advice
    Although mildly janky and not really being updated anymore, FontForge is free, powerful, and gets the job done. I've also tried out trufont, which I believe is being made by the same team โ€” the interface is cleaner but it seemed a little buggier and less powerful. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is the font market too saturated to get into nowadays?
    I use fontforge, trufont, and various scripts to build my fonts (like ttfautohint). Source: over 4 years ago

Input Mono mentions (36)

  • Font Comparison: Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono vs. JetBrains Mono and Fira Code
    Why don't we embrace proportional (i.e. Not monospace) fonts more for coding? IMHO, they are a big step up when it comes to legibility. I personally switched after I noticed reading stuff in the sidebar (which is usually in a proportional font) felt more comfortable than reading code. You can't use it for a terminal of course, and occasionally I find comments relying on monospace alignment. Other than that I see... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Coding Font Selection 'Tournament'
    DejaVu is one of my favorites, and it is odd to not see it included. Input Mono [1] by David Jonathan Ross is what I use these days. It's very similar to DejaVu, but I like it better because its geometry is a little rounder. DejaVu's "m" is very narrow, and it has fewer serifs (l, i, etc.), but it also has a serif version for those who want that (it's still very "sans"). It comes in many weights and has a... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Monaspace
    Seems like in modern times, on modern systems, we can move beyond monospaced fonts for code. I have recommended this many times here, but I use a proportional coding font: Input Sans https://input.djr.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • B612 Font Family
    Yes I ran into problem with distinguishing between ; and : as well on this monospace font. I'll say it was fun to try it and I used it for awhile but it isnt suitable for coding purposes. Im much more happy now with a highly customizable font like Input[0] where I can make it as wide or as narrow as I like it to be and also customize the various characters [0]: https://input.djr.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Bad Apple Font
    Does your browser have a "Reader" mode? There are font systems that target code and aren't monospace. An example is Input: https://input.djr.com/ - https://input.djr.com/preview/ The niche seems to be people who like to code without monospace, or who present code without monospace, e.g. In slides or in blog posts. Or if you want typographical consistency between non-code and code, as I understand you are suggesting. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TruFont and Input Mono, you can also consider the following products

FontForge - Free (libre) font editor for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU+Linux

Inconsolata - OSX, Productivity, Design, Typography, powerline, and Fonts

Glyphs - Make everything from dingbat webfonts to full-fledged text typefaces in the most Mac-like font...

Operator - Looking for something? Make a request and we'll find it.

FontCreator - This professional font editor allows you to create and edit TrueType and OpenType fonts.

Noto Mono - OSX, Typography, Fonts, Design, and powerline