Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TrackJS VS LOGBack

Compare TrackJS VS LOGBack and see what are their differences

TrackJS logo TrackJS

JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications

LOGBack logo LOGBack

Logging framework
  • TrackJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-27
  • LOGBack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

TrackJS features and specs

  • Real-time Error Tracking
    TrackJS provides real-time monitoring and alerting of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they occur in live environments.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    The service offers comprehensive error reports with detailed stack traces and metadata, helping developers understand the context of errors for more efficient debugging.
  • User-friendly Interface
    TrackJS features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate dashboard, making it accessible even for developers who may not be familiar with error tracking tools.
  • Integrations
    The platform supports various integrations with popular development tools and services such as Slack, GitHub, and Jira, enabling seamless workflow enhancements.
  • Performance Impact
    TrackJS is designed to have minimal performance impact on your application, ensuring that error tracking does not degrade user experience.

Possible disadvantages of TrackJS

  • Pricing
    TrackJS may be considered expensive for smaller teams or projects, as the cost can add up depending on the level of service required.
  • Customization
    While TrackJS provides a robust set of features out-of-the-box, it may lack the level of customization or flexibility needed for specific use cases or complex applications.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of TrackJS may have limitations in terms of features and data usage, which could be restrictive for some users looking for a more comprehensive solution.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Using TrackJS introduces a dependency on an external service for error tracking, which could be a concern for organizations with strict data policies or those preferring self-hosted solutions.

LOGBack features and specs

  • Performance
    LOGBack is designed to be performant with efficient computation and low memory footprint, making it suitable for high-load applications.
  • Configuration
    It offers a flexible and powerful configuration via XML or Groovy, allowing detailed customization for logging behavior.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with SLF4J provides a standard API for various logging frameworks, simplifying the logging implementation.
  • Rolling Policies
    Includes advanced rolling policies for log files, including time-based and size-based rotation, ensuring log management is efficient and organized.
  • Community Support
    Active community support and comprehensive documentation make it easier for developers to troubleshoot and enhance their implementation.

Possible disadvantages of LOGBack

  • Complexity
    The configuration complexity may be overwhelming for beginners who need only basic logging functionalities.
  • Dependency
    Adding LOGBack to a project increases the number of dependencies, which can affect project size and complexity management.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with SLF4J or complex logging requirements, there might be a steep learning curve.
  • Legacy Systems
    Integration with older systems that rely on legacy logging frameworks might require additional adjustments or code refactoring.

TrackJS videos

Redux TrackJS Logger

LOGBack videos

No LOGBack videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TrackJS and LOGBack)
Error Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
38 38%
62% 62
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TrackJS and LOGBack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TrackJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TrackJS mentions (1)

  • First 6 months with eBay/Adevinta
    Holding a hand on a pulse of metrics for errors;. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

LOGBack mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LOGBack yet. Tracking of LOGBack recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TrackJS and LOGBack, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

Logmatic - Logmatic is a log centralization, analytics & visualization platform to improve software & business performance.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

AWS CloudTrail - AWS CloudTrail is a web service that records AWS API calls for your account and delivers log files to you.

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

Serilog - Backend Development and Utilities