Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

TouchPortal VS socketify.py

Compare TouchPortal VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Status.io
Status.io is a hosted status page platform for incident communication and uptime monitoring. Keep your customers informed with real-time status updates, maintenance alerts, and transparent system notifications. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

TouchPortal logo TouchPortal

Touch Portal is a companion app to control a PC or a Mac by using a deck of buttons to improve the workflow & productivity of game streamers, content creators and professionals.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • TouchPortal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-15
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

TouchPortal features and specs

  • Affordability
    TouchPortal is generally more affordable compared to other hardware-based solutions like the Elgato Stream Deck, as it utilizes existing devices such as phones or tablets.
  • Customizability
    Users can create and customize their own buttons and layouts, allowing for tailored and specific setups that suit individual workflow needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    TouchPortal is compatible with both Windows and macOS, providing flexibility for users across different operating systems.
  • Plugin Support
    Supports plugins for extended functionality, allowing users to integrate additional services and applications as part of their setup.
  • Wireless Connectivity
    Allows the use of mobile devices over a wireless network, eliminating the need for a direct physical connection to the computer.

Possible disadvantages of TouchPortal

  • Dependency on Mobile Devices
    Requires a mobile device or tablet to function, which can be a limitation if these devices are unavailable or lacking in performance.
  • Potential Connectivity Issues
    Wireless connectivity between the mobile device and computer can sometimes result in latency or disconnection issues.
  • Learning Curve
    The level of customization available may result in a steeper learning curve for new users unfamiliar with setting up these types of systems.
  • Limited Features in Free Version
    The free version of TouchPortal has limited features compared to the paid version, which may restrict certain functionalities for users not willing to pay for upgrades.
  • Battery Usage
    Extended use on mobile devices may lead to significant battery consumption, necessitating frequent charging or use while plugged in.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

TouchPortal videos

+ Add

Touch portal tutorial

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TouchPortal and socketify.py)

TouchPortal

socketify.py

Entertainment
100 100%
Entertainment
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100
Office & Productivity
100 100%
Office & Productivity
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
Web Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TouchPortal and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, socketify.py should be more popular than TouchPortal. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TouchPortal mentions (1)

  • Best or easy to use remote app for OBS
    I use TouchPortal to control my obs, it's like $15 and you need a tablet or smartphone to run it, but it makes it so much easier, especially with limited screen space. Source: over 4 years ago

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TouchPortal and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

Macro Deck - Use smartphone as macropad for pc

Deckboard - Deckboard helps you create macros for Windows PC and launch them on your phone.

MATRIC - Control PC applications via smarthone/tablet. Especially suitable for space/flightsims.

UP Deck - UP Deck is a programmable control deck that you can use as a remote control for your multimedia platforms, including gaming, streaming, broadcasting, and much more.

StreamPi - StreamPi is a robust remote control app alternative to StreamDeck.

StreamControl - StreamControl is an app that lets you remotely control Streamlabs and OBS studio from your smartphone or tablet.

Loading...