TouchPortal VS Digraph.dev

• Affordability
  TouchPortal is generally more affordable compared to other hardware-based solutions like the Elgato Stream Deck, as it utilizes existing devices such as phones or tablets.
• Customizability
  Users can create and customize their own buttons and layouts, allowing for tailored and specific setups that suit individual workflow needs.
• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  TouchPortal is compatible with both Windows and macOS, providing flexibility for users across different operating systems.
• Plugin Support
  Supports plugins for extended functionality, allowing users to integrate additional services and applications as part of their setup.
• Wireless Connectivity
  Allows the use of mobile devices over a wireless network, eliminating the need for a direct physical connection to the computer.

Possible disadvantages

• Dependency on Mobile Devices
  Requires a mobile device or tablet to function, which can be a limitation if these devices are unavailable or lacking in performance.
• Potential Connectivity Issues
  Wireless connectivity between the mobile device and computer can sometimes result in latency or disconnection issues.
• Learning Curve
  The level of customization available may result in a steeper learning curve for new users unfamiliar with setting up these types of systems.
• Limited Features in Free Version
  The free version of TouchPortal has limited features compared to the paid version, which may restrict certain functionalities for users not willing to pay for upgrades.
• Battery Usage
  Extended use on mobile devices may lead to significant battery consumption, necessitating frequent charging or use while plugged in.

• Developer-focused positioning
  The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
• Graph-based approach
  The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
• Modern, minimal presentation
  Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
• Potential for better organization and clarity
  If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
• Early-stage responsiveness
  Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

Touch portal tutorial

No Digraph.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Best or easy to use remote app for OBS

  I use TouchPortal to control my obs, it's like $15 and you need a tablet or smartphone to run it, but it makes it so much easier, especially with limited screen space. Source: almost 5 years ago

Tracking Digraph.dev since Oct 2026.