TotalFinder VS cppq

• Tab Management
  TotalFinder enhances macOS Finder by introducing a tabbed interface, allowing users to manage multiple Finder windows within a single window seamlessly. This improves organization and workspace efficiency.
• Dual Pane View
  The dual pane view feature lets users compare and move files between two different directories without having to open multiple windows, thereby streamlining file management tasks.
• Visor Feature
  TotalFinder includes the Visor feature, which provides users with a quick-access, system-wide Finder window that can be toggled with a simple keystroke. This enhances accessibility and workflow speed.
• Folder Organization
  It offers the option to keep folders on top when sorting by name, which is not natively available in macOS Finder, thus making it easier to locate directories amidst numerous files.
• Cut and Paste Support
  Unlike the default Finder, TotalFinder enables true cut and paste functionalities for files, making file operations more intuitive for users familiar with this feature from other operating systems.

Possible disadvantages

• System Integration
  As a third-party application, TotalFinder modifies the default Finder, which can lead to potential stability issues and conflicts with future macOS updates. Apple's system design inherently limits some integrations for security and stability reasons.
• Cost
  TotalFinder is a paid application, which may not be appealing to users who prefer free alternatives or are satisfied with the default Finder's capabilities.
• Limited Customization
  While TotalFinder offers several enhancements, it lacks the extensive customization features available in some other third-party Finder replacements, potentially limiting its appeal to power users who want a highly tailored experience.
• Deprecated Support
  Development and support for TotalFinder may not be as robust as those provided by Apple for the system's default Finder. This can mean slower updates or a lack of support for new macOS features.
• Compatibility Issues
  There can be compatibility issues with certain system configurations or third-party extensions, which might necessitate troubleshooting or reverting to default Finder functionality.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

No analysis of TotalFinder yet.

TotalFinder App Review, Must have Mac OS X App

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Recommended Software for Mac that You cannot Miss

  Copy various file path formats. You can download it from the official website for a permanent license. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Done with Pathfinder

  TotalFinder is back. You need to disable SIP, but if you know what you are doing on your mac and don't open/download shady stuff, it should be fine. Source: over 3 years ago

• What is the best alternative to the Guake terminal in macOS with the most closed-in look and functionality?

  And just since visor mode was mentioned as a requirement, I'd like to mention that I also run TotalFinder which—among many other things—extends Finder into running in visor mode as well. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.