Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Tiny C Compiler VS KiTTY

Compare Tiny C Compiler VS KiTTY and see what are their differences

BusinessXray
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Tiny C Compiler logo Tiny C Compiler

The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.

KiTTY logo KiTTY

KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.
  • Tiny C Compiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-06
  • KiTTY Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-31

Tiny C Compiler features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
  • Small Size
    TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
  • C99 Support
    TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
  • Dynamic Code Generation
    TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
  • Simplified Licensing
    Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages of Tiny C Compiler

  • Limited Optimization
    TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
  • Incomplete C Standard Library
    TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
  • Lack of Detailed Documentation
    Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
  • Limited Platform Support
    TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
  • Fewer Community Resources
    Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

KiTTY features and specs

  • Enhanced Features
    KiTTY offers more features than PuTTY, including additional options such as automatic password saving, session filtering, and session launcher, enhancing user experience and productivity.
  • Portability
    The tool is available in a portable version, which does not require installation. This makes it convenient for use on different machines without needing administrator permissions.
  • Customization
    KiTTY supports a variety of customization options, such as configurable shortcuts, transparency options, and built-in chat functionalities, allowing users to tailor the terminal emulator to their specific needs.
  • Integration with Windows
    KiTTY integrates well with Windows, offering features like the ability to create desktop shortcuts for sessions and support for Windows jump lists.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    KiTTY allows the automation of tasks through its scripting capabilities, making it easier for users to perform repetitive tasks efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of KiTTY

  • Windows-Only
    KiTTY is designed primarily for Windows, which limits its usability for users on other operating systems such as macOS or Linux.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    The additional features and options may result in a steeper learning curve for new users who are accustomed to simpler tools.
  • Stability Issues
    Some users may encounter stability issues or bugs, which could affect reliability during critical tasks.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Compared to some other terminal emulators, KiTTY does not receive updates as frequently, which may lead to slower implementation of new features or security fixes.
  • Security Concerns
    Automatically saving passwords can introduce security risks if the local machine is compromised, as stored credentials could become accessible to unauthorized users.

Analysis of KiTTY

Overall verdict

  • Overall, KiTTY is considered a good choice for users who are already comfortable with PuTTY but need extra features, better customization, and enhanced security. Its popularity in the tech community stems from its reliability, wide range of features, and the fact that it builds on a well-established tool.

Why this product is good

  • KiTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator that's based on PuTTY. It offers additional features such as session filtering, automatic logon scripts, a portable version, and support for various encryptions. These enhancements make it particularly valuable for users who require more robust functionality than what is available in the basic PuTTY client.

Recommended for

    KiTTY is recommended for developers, network administrators, and IT professionals who regularly use SSH and telnet protocols, especially those who require advanced features and automation in managing their connections. It is also a good option for anyone looking for a portable, customizable terminal emulator.

Tiny C Compiler videos

No Tiny C Compiler videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

KiTTY videos

+ Add

Kitty In My Pocket Series 4 Hidden Kitties Blind Bag Toy Review | PSToyReviews

More videos:

  • Review - Kitty Paw Review - with Tom Vasel
  • Review - Sparkle * Kitty Review - with Tom Vasel
  • Review - KiTTY -SSH Client for Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tiny C Compiler and KiTTY)

Tiny C Compiler

KiTTY

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
SSH
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Server Management
0 0%
Server Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Tiny C Compiler and KiTTY. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Tiny C Compiler and KiTTY

Tiny C Compiler Reviews

We have no reviews of Tiny C Compiler yet.
Be the first one to post

KiTTY Reviews

10 Best PuTTY Alternatives To Try in 2024
Indeed, alternatives like KiTTY, Solar-PuTTY, and MobaXterm cater to both Windows and macOS users, ensuring a wide range of options for SSH and Telnet session management.
Source: www.redswitches.com
10 Best PuTTY Alternatives for SSH Remote Connection
For starters, KiTTY runs on Windows and MACs but can also access Linux, Unix, and MAC OS devices. The application also offers a similar user interface and experience as PuTTY, so those familiar with it are in luck.
Source: www.tecmint.com
Looking for MobaXterm Alternative? Here are Some Options to Consider
KiTTY is a fork of Putty that adds several features and enhancements. It includes support for session filters, automatic password saving, and URL hyperlinks. KiTTY also has a portable version that can be run from a USB drive without installation. However, KiTTY hasn't been updated since 2019, so it may not be suitable for newer Windows versions.
Source: www.learnitguide.net
Top 12 BEST SSH Clients For Windows โ€“ Free PuTTY Alternatives
KiTTY has the capacity to handle a port knocking sequence. You can integrate KiTTY into Internet Explorer or other browsers like Firefox.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The Kitty emulator is an excellent option for keyboard power users. The key feature of Kitty that makes it into this list is the GPU-based development. It offloads rendering to the GPU for lower system load, and it decreases CPU utilization which improves scrolling and general responsiveness.
Source: www.fosslinux.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tiny C Compiler mentions (37)

  • What every compiler writer should know about programmers (Anton Ertl, 2015) [pdf]
    Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Git: Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatorty
    In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Weird Lexical Syntax
    > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust
    "Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
    For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

KiTTY mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of KiTTY yet. Tracking of KiTTY recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tiny C Compiler and KiTTY, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

ConEmu - ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

Loading...