Tiny C Compiler VS Cheerp

Tiny C Compiler

The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.

Cheerp

Enterprise-grade C/C++ compiler for Web applications. Compiles to WASM/JavaScript

Landing page //
2019-11-06

Landing page //
2023-05-13

Cheerp

Website: leaningtech.com

Edit details

Tiny C Compiler features and specs

Fast Compilation
Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
Small Size
TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
C99 Support
TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
Dynamic Code Generation
TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
Simplified Licensing
Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages of Tiny C Compiler

Limited Optimization
TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
Incomplete C Standard Library
TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
Lack of Detailed Documentation
Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
Limited Platform Support
TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
Fewer Community Resources
Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

Cheerp features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tiny C Compiler and Cheerp)

Cheerp

IDE

80 80%

IDE

20% 20

Email Marketing

78 78%

Email Marketing

22% 22

Project Management

61 61%

Project Management

39% 39

Text Editors

86 86%

Text Editors

14% 14

User comments

Share your experience with using Tiny C Compiler and Cheerp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be a lot more popular than Cheerp. While we know about 36 links to Tiny C Compiler, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Cheerp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tiny C Compiler mentions (36)

Git: Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatorty
In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
Weird Lexical Syntax
> I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust
"Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Exploring the Internals of Linux v0.01
I was going to say, the list should include something by Fabrice Bellard. Tiny C Compiler is one. https://bellard.org/tcc/ I was thinking, maybe first version/commit of QEMU would be interesting to read. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Cheerp mentions (2)

I absolutely guarantee, with ZERO chance of being wrong, that I can write anything you want in 'C', better than you can in any language of your choice aside from assembler. It will be more efficient, smaller, and faster.
It's called https://leaningtech.com/cheerp/. Source: over 3 years ago
Function Pointer Cast Handling in Pyodide
It then creates an adapter function that calls the original and pass more (or less) arguments to it with default values, and returns that function address instead of the original bitcasted one. This is not a perfect solution, because in theory one can store the pointer and convert it to a different type later, but in the case of python C extensions this is sufficient to fix the issue (at least in my experiments),... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago