Remote support software that just works. Securely access attended or unattended computers from anywhere.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Tilix
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
6 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
6 vs 0
Terminal Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Tiling Support Tilix allows users to split the terminal window into multiple panes, either horizontally or vertically, enabling efficient multitasking and organization of terminal sessions.
Session Management Users can save layouts and configurations as sessions, allowing easy restoration of previous work environments for improved productivity.
Customizability Tilix offers extensive customization options, including themes, color schemes, keybindings, and more, catering to diverse user preferences.
Quake Mode A drop-down terminal feature (inspired by the console in Quake) allows for quick access to a terminal that slides from the top of the screen, enhancing convenience.
Drag and Drop Users can effortlessly rearrange terminals or move tabs between different windows using a simple drag-and-drop interface.
Possible disadvantages
Performance Overhead Due to its GTK-based design, Tilix may consume more system resources compared to simpler terminal emulators, potentially impacting performance on lower-end systems.
Learning Curve With its extensive features and customization options, new users may face a steeper learning curve to fully leverage Tilix's capabilities compared to more straightforward terminal emulators.
Limited Wayland Support Tilix's support for Wayland, a modern display server protocol, is still not as robust as its X11 support, potentially leading to compatibility issues on systems using Wayland.
Dependency on GTK Since Tilix relies on the GTK framework, it may not integrate as well visually or functionally in non-GNOME desktop environments, affecting the user experience.
Lightweight C++ implementation cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
Redis-backed reliability Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
Inspired by proven design (asynq) The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
Native integration for C++ projects For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
Open source and inspectable Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.
Possible disadvantages
Limited maturity and battle-testing Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
Smaller community and ecosystem Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
Documentation gaps As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
C++ build and dependency complexity Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
Fewer built-in features and tooling cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Tilixcppq
No analysis of Tilix yet.
Overall verdict
cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.
Why this product is good
Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications
Recommended for
C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient
Tilix is a Gnome Human Interface Guidelines-compliant GTK3 tiling terminal emulator and manager. Users can drag and drop programme windows horizontally and vertically to organise them. Also check SiteGround Alternatives
Tilix offers its users a lot of features including working with custom titles and custom hyperlinks, support for transparent background images, notifications in the background, multiple panes, and persistent layouts.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Tilix6 mentionscppq0 mentions
We need a play on "Unix" to get it
FWIW, this is the only D codebase I've contributed to: https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Concerned about GNOME 42 Console
I didn't know why you said that so I looked at the tilix github site and I see a disclaimer. However, if you look at the commit rate you can see that it is still quite actively maintained and I see no issues when I use it.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Transparent terminal
I use Tilix. It's similar to GNOME Terminal, but with a lot more features.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Common uses of the term are, "html coding" and "html website". A website created in pure html is also referred to as a static website. In other words, it does not interact with the visitor other than in the most basic ways.
