Software Alternatives & Startups

Thunar VS ImgSplit

Compare Thunar VS ImgSplit and see what are their differences

Thunar

Thunar is a modern file manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment.

Thunar Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
ImgSplit

Free MIT browser toolkit for splitting images, Instagram/grid/carousel tiles, compress, watermark, and local AI background removal. Images never leave the device. github.com/ZooHero500/imgsplit

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Thunar seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
4 vs 0
FTP Client popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
141 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Thunar
ImgSplit
Website docs.xfce.org imgsplit.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Thunar 5 features
ImgSplit 5 features
  • Lightweight
    Thunar is a file manager designed to be fast and low on system resource usage, making it suitable for older hardware or systems with limited resources.
  • Simple Interface
    Thunar offers a clean and straightforward user interface, which makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files without a steep learning curve.
  • Extensible
    Thunar supports plugins, allowing users to extend its functionality with additional features like bulk renaming or adding custom actions.
  • Integration with Xfce
    Thunar is the default file manager for the Xfce desktop environment, ensuring tight integration and consistent behavior across the desktop.
  • Custom Actions
    Users can configure custom actions that appear in the context menu, providing a level of personalization and flexibility in daily file management tasks.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other file managers, Thunar lacks some advanced features like integrated terminal panels or advanced search capabilities.
  • Slower Development
    Thunar's development cycle can be slower compared to other file managers, which might result in delays in new features and bug fixes.
  • Less Customizable
    While Thunar does offer some level of customization, it is not as customizable as some other file managers that allow more extensive interface and functionality tweaks.
  • Dependent on Xfce Components
    Thunar relies on various Xfce components, which might lead to dependencies that are less desirable if you are not using Xfce as your desktop environment.
  • Limited Network Browsing
    Thunar’s capabilities for network browsing and managing remote files are not as robust as some other file managers, which may be a limitation for certain users.
  • Easy to Use
    ImgSplit offers a simple, intuitive interface that allows users to quickly upload images and split them into grids without needing technical expertise or software installation.
  • Free to Use
    The tool is available at no cost, making it accessible for casual users, social media enthusiasts, and small businesses who want to create grid posts without investing in paid software.
  • No Software Installation Required
    Since it operates as a web-based tool, users can access ImgSplit directly from their browser on any device without downloading or installing additional software.
  • Ideal for Social Media Grids
    ImgSplit is specifically designed to help users create Instagram grid posts and puzzle feeds, splitting one image into multiple tiles that fit together seamlessly when posted in sequence.
  • Customizable Grid Options
    Users can typically choose different grid sizes and configurations (e.g., 3x3, 2x2) to fit their specific layout needs, providing some flexibility in how the image is divided.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Editing Features
    ImgSplit focuses solely on splitting images and lacks more advanced photo editing tools like filters, cropping precision, or color correction found in comprehensive editing software.
  • Dependent on Internet Connection
    Being a web-based tool, ImgSplit requires a stable internet connection to function, which can be inconvenient for users in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Uploading personal images to a third-party website may raise privacy or data security concerns for users who are cautious about where their images are processed and stored.
  • Limited Customization for Non-Standard Grids
    While it offers basic grid splitting, users looking for highly customized or non-standard grid shapes may find the tool's options too restrictive.
  • No Offline Access
    Since ImgSplit is only available online, users cannot use the tool without internet access, unlike desktop-based alternatives that may work offline.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Thunar 3 videos + Add
ImgSplit 0 videos + Add

Showing Thunar file browsers preferences

More videos

  • Review - Comparing File Managers - Nautilus Versus Thunar Versus Nemo
  • Review - Add Custom Actions to Thunar File Manager

No ImgSplit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Thunar
ImgSplit
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Thunar and ImgSplit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Thunar 4 mentions
ImgSplit 0 mentions

View more

Tracking ImgSplit since Aug 2026.

Alternatives to Thunar and ImgSplit

When comparing Thunar and ImgSplit, you can also consider the following products.