Software Alternatives & Startups

testling VS BackstopJS

Compare testling VS BackstopJS and see what are their differences

testling

Automatic browser tests on every push

testling Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
BackstopJS

BackstopJS is an open-source tool that allows the user to capture screenshots of a complete webpage or only specific areas of the webpage.

BackstopJS Landing page
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Browser Testing popularity
31% vs 69%
alternatives listed
43 vs 18

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

testling
BackstopJS
Website ci.testling.com garris.github.io
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

testling 0 features
BackstopJS 6 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Automated Visual Regression Testing
    BackstopJS automates visual regression testing by comparing DOM screenshots, making it easy to identify visual anomalies after code changes.
  • Configuration Flexibility
    It offers robust configuration options to customize viewports, scenarios, and comparison thresholds, allowing for tailored testing based on project needs.
  • Scenario Management
    Supports the creation of multiple scenarios for different pages and states of the application, providing comprehensive test coverage.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    Easily integrates with continuous integration and deployment pipelines, facilitating automated testing across development stages.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, BackstopJS is free to use and benefits from community contributions and improvements.
  • Support for Puppeteer
    Built on modern tools like Puppeteer, providing reliable headless browser automation features for capturing and comparing visuals.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    The initial setup can be complex for those who are not familiar with headless browsers or visual testing concepts, potentially resulting in a steep learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running visual tests can be resource-intensive, which might affect performance, especially with a large number of scenarios and comparisons.
  • Maintenance Effort
    Creating and maintaining test scenarios can require ongoing effort as the application evolves, including updating baselines and handling false positives.
  • Limited to Visual Testing
    BackstopJS focuses solely on visual regression testing and doesn't provide broader testing capabilities like functionality or performance testing, necessitating additional tools for comprehensive test coverage.
  • Screenshot Differences
    Slight, acceptable differences in rendering between test runs can lead to false positives, requiring fine-tuning and adjustments for threshold settings.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

testling 0 videos + Add
BackstopJS 3 videos + Add

No testling videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Visual Regression Testing with BackstopJS

More videos

  • Review - Texas Camp 2019 | Visual Regression Testing with BackstopJS
  • Review - Supercharge your regression testing with BackstopJS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
testling
BackstopJS
31% 31%
69% 69%
35% 35%
65% 65%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using testling and BackstopJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to testling and BackstopJS

When comparing testling and BackstopJS, you can also consider the following products.