Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

TanStack Table VS Materialize CSS

Compare TanStack Table VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

TanStack Table

Headless UI for building powerful tables & datagrids with TS/JS, React, Solid, Svelte and Vue

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
ScreenSnap Pro
Stop sharing plain, boring screenshots. Add stunning backgrounds, pro annotations, and instant cloud links — all in one click. Pay once, own it forever. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS should be more popular than TanStack Table. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 28
Developer Tools popularity
11% vs 89%
alternatives listed
31 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

TanStack Table
Materialize CSS
Website tanstack.com materializecss.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
Design Tools UI Design Data Grid Developer Tools +1
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

TanStack Table 5 features
Materialize CSS 5 features
  • Performance
    TanStack Table is designed for high performance, capable of handling large datasets efficiently through features like virtualized scrolling, which only renders visible rows.
  • Customization
    Provides extensive customization options for UI and behavior, allowing developers to tailor the table to specific needs with hooks and plugins.
  • Lightweight
    The core library is minimal and can be extended with plugins, making it lightweight by default and allowing developers to include only the features they need.
  • Headless Design
    Being headless, TanStack Table focuses solely on offering functionality, leaving the implementation of styles and appearance completely to the developer, which provides flexibility.
  • Community and Documentation
    The library has an active community and comprehensive documentation, which helps developers quickly understand and implement features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    With its headless nature and high level of customization, there can be a steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with its approach or those new to React.
  • Lack of Built-in Styles
    Since it does not include built-in styles or components, additional work is required to implement design aspects, which may be a drawback for projects that need a quick setup.
  • React Dependency
    It is specifically designed for React, which makes it unsuitable for projects built with other frameworks.
  • Fragmentation
    Due to its plugin-based architecture, essential features can sometimes depend on third-party solutions, leading to possible fragmentation or inconsistency in updates and support.
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

TanStack Table
Materialize CSS

No analysis of TanStack Table yet.

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

TanStack Table 0 videos + Add
Materialize CSS 1 video + Add

No TanStack Table videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
TanStack Table
Materialize CSS
11% 11%
Developer Tools
89% 89%
9% 9%
Design Tools
91% 91%
0% 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100%
100% 100%
Data Grid
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using TanStack Table and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

TanStack Table no reviews yet
Materialize CSS no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

TanStack Table 6 mentions
Materialize CSS 28 mentions
  • Building a Google Sheets–Like Table Component with TanStack Table, Zod, and ShadCN/UI
    TanStack Table for the core table logic. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • What are headless UI libraries?
    UI libraries aside, the whole headless rave has spread to packages and libraries for standalone components, headless text editors like Tiptap and Platejs, headless table components like Tanstack table, and more out there to explore. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Task tracker application using NextJS and SurrealDB
    To create the task table I have used [@tanstack/react-table](https://tanstack.com/table/v8) as it has many features like searching, pagination, sorting, and filtering. As it is a Headless table library it handles most of the complex... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

View more

  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to TanStack Table and Materialize CSS

When comparing TanStack Table and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...