Software Alternatives & Startups

TakeShape VS CloudLinux

Compare TakeShape VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

TakeShape

TakeShape is Headless GraphQL CMS and Static Site Generator

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, TakeShape seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 0
CMS popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

TakeShape
CloudLinux
Website takeshape.io cloudlinux.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

TakeShape 5 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Headless CMS
    TakeShape offers a headless content management system that allows developers to separate the backend from the frontend, giving them greater flexibility in designing and deploying websites and applications.
  • GraphQL API
    The platform provides a powerful GraphQL API that makes data querying more efficient and intuitive, allowing developers to request only the data they need.
  • Ease of Integration
    TakeShape integrates smoothly with various third-party services and platforms, facilitating a seamless development experience and cutting down on integration time.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Includes features such as content modeling, microservices, and static site generation, offering a robust environment for developers to create complex projects.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale with your project needs, making it suitable for both small-scale projects and larger, enterprise-level applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its advanced features and use of GraphQL, some beginners might face a steep learning curve compared to more traditional CMS platforms.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    While TakeShape offers integration capabilities, its plugin ecosystem is not as extensive as some other CMS platforms, limiting options for certain extensions.
  • Pricing Concerns
    For smaller projects or individual developers, the cost of using TakeShape might be a consideration compared to other, less expensive alternatives.
  • Dependence on Third-Party Integrations
    Heavy reliance on third-party services could be a limitation if those services change their APIs or pricing models, potentially affecting the project's stability.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

TakeShape
CloudLinux

No analysis of TakeShape yet.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

TakeShape 1 video + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

OPTAVIA/ TAKESHAPE FOR LIFE/ MEDIFAST REVIEW!!

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
TakeShape
CloudLinux
100% 100%
CMS
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using TakeShape and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

TakeShape 3 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • The Jamstack Identity Crisis: an Even-Handed Overview
    We'd love to hear your thoughts on those four questions too! Make sure to tag us on Twitter at @TakeShapeIO and @jadenguitarman with your thoughts and check out our site at TakeShape.io to learn more about our plans. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • Our 8 favorite tools for monetizing your Jamstack website
    Some more complicated setups can start getting difficult to manage, as Stripe locks you to using their system of products, subscriptions, prices, and customers, but that system is more than adequate for the vast majority of use cases.... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
  • Demystifying GraphQL Queries
    After conceptualizing something new, and learning the syntax, I want to jump head first and start using my newly earned knowledge on a big new project! But, alas, I know that wouldn't be wise. It's best to start tinkering on a low... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to TakeShape and CloudLinux

When comparing TakeShape and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.