Software Alternatives & Startups

Syncfusion VS DHTMLX

Compare Syncfusion VS DHTMLX and see what are their differences

Syncfusion

The world's best UI component suite for building powerful web, desktop, and mobile apps

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
DHTMLX

JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

DHTMLX might be a bit more popular than Syncfusion. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Syncfusion.

social mentions
1 vs 1
Prototyping popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
61 vs 77

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Syncfusion
DHTMLX
Website syncfusion.com dhtmlx.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
JavaScript ASP.NET MVC Flutter Vue ReactJS Angular +3
—
Company 2,000 - 4,999 employees —
Listed in

About Syncfusion and DHTMLX

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Syncfusion
DHTMLX

Syncfusion understands the challenges facing software developers and business teams. Between ensuring deadlines are met, managing project requirements, and testing and debugging your applications, time is your most important resource, and it seems like you never have enough of it. That’s where we...

Read more about Syncfusion

No description of DHTMLX yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Syncfusion 6 features
DHTMLX 5 features
  • Wide Range of Components
    Syncfusion offers a comprehensive suite of UI controls and frameworks for a range of platforms including web, desktop, and mobile applications, making it a versatile choice for developers.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The components are loaded with features, which can save developers time as they do not need to build functionalities from scratch.
  • Excellent Documentation
    Syncfusion provides extensive documentation and examples, which are helpful for developers to quickly implement and troubleshoot components.
  • Good Customer Support
    The company offers responsive customer support, which is advantageous for resolving issues encountered during development.
  • Regular Updates
    Syncfusion regularly updates its components with new features, improvements, and bug fixes, thereby enhancing product quality over time.
  • Cost-effectiveness
    Their pricing model, including the option of a community license for smaller teams or personal use, can be cost-effective for many users.
  • Comprehensive Suite
    DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
  • Rich Documentation
    The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
  • Support and Community
    DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
  • Customizability
    The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Proprietary Framework
    Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
  • Limited Open Source Contributions
    As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Syncfusion 3 videos + Add
DHTMLX 3 videos + Add

Syncfusion

More videos

  • - what Blazor component to choose? component comparison MudBlazor vs Syncfusion vs MatBlazor vs Radzen
  • - Syncfusion Essential Studio and UI Kit for Xamarin & Xamarin.Forms

Dhtmlx Scheduler

More videos

  • - dhtmlxGantt 6.1 Release: Time Constraints, Backward Scheduling, S-curve and dataProcessor Update
  • - Dhtmlx-Grid with Flux4 Part2

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Syncfusion
DHTMLX
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Syncfusion and DHTMLX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Syncfusion 1 mention
DHTMLX 1 mention

Alternatives to Syncfusion and DHTMLX

When comparing Syncfusion and DHTMLX, you can also consider the following products.