Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

SwiftDefaultApps VS Types

Compare SwiftDefaultApps VS Types and see what are their differences

Axcrypt
AxCrypt - Password Protect Files With Strong Encryption. AxCrypt is the leading open source file encryption software for Windows. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

SwiftDefaultApps logo SwiftDefaultApps

Replacement for RCDefaultApp, written for macOS Sierra, in Swift 3.

Types logo Types

“Types” is a free and lightweight utility for Windows that allows you to edit program...
  • SwiftDefaultApps Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06
  • Types Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-26

SwiftDefaultApps features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Types features and specs

  • Static Type Checking
    Types provide static type checking, which helps catch errors at compile time rather than runtime. This can lead to more stable and bug-free code.
  • Improved Code Documentation
    Using types can serve as in-line documentation, making code easier to understand and maintain. It provides clear expectations for how functions and components are intended to be used.
  • Enhanced Developer Experience
    With type information, IDEs and editors can offer better auto-completions, refactoring tools, and in-line error checking, resulting in a more productive development environment.
  • Safer Refactoring
    Types make it easier to refactor code safely since they provide a clear contract that code must adhere to, reducing the risk of introducing errors during the refactoring process.

Possible disadvantages of Types

  • Increased Complexity
    Adding types can increase the complexity of the codebase, particularly for developers who are not familiar with the concept of static typing.
  • Initial Overhead
    Introducing types into a project requires initial configuration and learning, which might slow down development at the beginning.
  • Reduced Flexibility
    Static typing can reduce flexibility, as the types imposed might limit dynamic behaviors that some JavaScript developers are familiar with.
  • Potential for Overhead in Small Projects
    For small projects, the overhead introduced by setting up and maintaining a type system might not justify the benefits received from using types.

SwiftDefaultApps videos

No SwiftDefaultApps videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Types videos

+ Add

Types of Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - Z Review - Headphone Types
  • Review - NCCMT - URE - Types of Reviews - What kind of review do we need

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SwiftDefaultApps and Types)

SwiftDefaultApps

Types

CRM
48 48%
CRM
52% 52
Cloud Storage
43 43%
Cloud Storage
57% 57
Monitoring Tools
46 46%
Monitoring Tools
54% 54
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SwiftDefaultApps and Types. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Types seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SwiftDefaultApps mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SwiftDefaultApps yet. Tracking of SwiftDefaultApps recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Types mentions (2)

  • what
    Other must haves (at least for me) are Types and a few NirSoft tools called ShellExView, ShellMenuView and FileTypesMan. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Edit context menu
    I had a similar need some time ago, I found and tried many options out there and unfortunately most of them were not what I was looking for, grossly out-of-date, or weren't worth the time. So far the best thing I was able to find is Types. It can't do everything you are looking for, but it can do some of it. Before proceeding though, it may be worth learning how file classes are handled and how the registry works... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SwiftDefaultApps and Types, you can also consider the following products

FileTypesMan - FileTypesMan is an alternative to the File Types tab in the Folder Options of Windows.

RCDefaultApp - RCDefaultApp is a Mac OS X 10.

Default Programs Editor - Default Programs Editor is a powerful but simple file association utility for Windows 7, Vista and...

MacDrive - MacDrive allows you to access the contents of a Mac hard drive using a Windows PC.

Shell context menu manager - Powerful and lightweight context menu manager for Windows File Explorer.

Duti - duti is a command-line utility capable of setting default applications for various document types on macOS, using Apple's Uniform Type Identifiers (UTI). It's the CLI analog to RCDefaultApps and SwiftDefaultApps

Loading...