Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

surge.sh VS LinkStack

Compare surge.sh VS LinkStack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

LinkStack logo LinkStack

LinkStack - the ultimate solution for creating a personalized & professional profile page. Showcase all your important links in one place, forget the limitation of one link on social media. Set up your personal site on your own server with just a few
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • LinkStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

LinkStack features and specs

  • Customization
    LinkStack allows users to customize the appearance of their link pages, enabling personal branding and a consistent look and feel that aligns with their style or business identity.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, LinkStack offers transparency and the ability for users to modify and improve the platform according to their needs, as well as contribute to its development.
  • Cost-effective
    As a free platform, LinkStack provides an economical option for users who want to manage multiple links without incurring subscription fees that many other link management tools charge.
  • Ease of Use
    LinkStack is designed to be user-friendly, allowing users to quickly set up a link page without requiring extensive technical knowledge or complex configurations.

Possible disadvantages of LinkStack

  • Limited Support
    As with many open-source projects, LinkStack may lack the dedicated customer support that paid services provide, which can be a drawback for users needing immediate assistance.
  • Feature Limitations
    While LinkStack covers the basics of link management, it may not offer as many advanced features as premium services, such as analytics or integrations with social media platforms.
  • Self-hosting Requirements
    LinkStack requires users to host the platform themselves, which can be a hurdle for those without the technical know-how or resources to manage their own hosting.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For users or businesses with large-scale operations, LinkStack might not scale as well compared to more robust, commercially supported link management solutions.

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

LinkStack videos

LinkStack - An Even Better Linktree Alternative

More videos:

  • Review - Self-Hosted Link Tree Alternative | LinkStack Linode Setup Guide

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and LinkStack)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Link Management
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
85 85%
15% 15
Personal Website
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and LinkStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh seems to be a lot more popular than LinkStack. While we know about 29 links to surge.sh, we've tracked only 1 mention of LinkStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (29)

  • Cloudflare Drop
    I found https://surge.sh to be a nice version of this kind of thing. Just go into a folder and type `surge` and there you go. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Have a Fucking Website
    If you already have your HTML and CSS, just upload it to https://surge.sh/ or another one of the bajillions of static site hosting services. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • I tested free subdomain hosting for WebTiles so you don't have to
    Yoursite.surge.sh - normal usage requires the surge NPM module installed, then to be invoked from the exact folder on your system within the commandline terminal, but has multiple alternative deployment guides. Unlimited free subdomains. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    . Netlify : Deploy your web projects with ease. . Render : Host web applications and static sites effortlessly. . GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. . Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. . Vercel: Deploy websites and applications with automatic deployments. . Cyclic.sh: Host your static sites with zero configuration. . Appwrite:... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Automated delivery React / Vue app for each Pull Request.
    We need to have a unique name per each PR to differentiate the builds. In order to release an app with a unique name, we are using PR number from CircleCI and deploy it via Surge service. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

LinkStack mentions (1)

  • So I created Linktree alternative...
    Basically I wanted to host my link list myself, and existing solutions were not satisfactory enough for me. Either because of how routing behaved, or were too bloated (really? Laravel for simple page with links? I'm looking at you linkstack). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and LinkStack, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Linktree - Connect your audience to all of your content with just one link.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Carrd - Simple, responsive one-page site creator.

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

Desygner - Empower your teams to create, store, and distribute marketing materials that are always on brand. Equip anyone to become a guided content creator, reducing design bottlenecks, and allowing you to go to market faster.