Software Alternatives & Startups

Supernotes VS Foam

Compare Supernotes VS Foam and see what are their differences

Supernotes

The fastest way to take notes and collaborate with friends. Create notecards with Markdown, LaTeX, images, emojis and more. Get started for free!

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Foam

Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than Supernotes. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.

social mentions
22 vs 49
Productivity popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Supernotes
Foam
Website supernotes.app foambubble.github.io
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
Windows Mac OSX Linux Android iOS Web +3
—
Company Startup from the United Kingdom · 2019 Startup from the United States
Listed in

About Supernotes and Foam

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Supernotes
Foam

Supernotes is a new way to create notes and collaborate with your friends. Quickly create note-cards with diverse content from task lists to maths equations, with full markdown and LaTeX support. You can tag your cards, find relevant keywords, and sort your cards in an instant. Each and every...

Read more about Supernotes

No description of Foam yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Supernotes 5 features
Foam 6 features
  • Clean UI
  • Responsive Design
  • Categories
  • Importing
  • Markdown
  • Open Source
    Foam is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and allows for community-driven development and contributions. Users can modify the source code to fit their specific needs.
  • Markdown Support
    Foam uses Markdown, a lightweight and easy-to-read syntax, making it simple to create and manage notes. This also allows for easy integration with other Markdown-based tools and platforms.
  • Integration with Visual Studio Code
    Foam is designed to work seamlessly with Visual Studio Code (VS Code). This provides users with a powerful and familiar text editor environment, complete with extensions and customization options.
  • Graph View
    Foam includes a graph visualization feature that helps users see and navigate the relationships between their notes, making it easier to understand and manage complex information.
  • Bidirectional Links
    Foam supports bidirectional links, allowing users to create connections between notes in both directions. This enhances the note-taking experience by enabling a more interconnected and dynamic information structure.
  • Community and Documentation
    Foam has a growing community of users and contributors, as well as comprehensive documentation. This support network helps users troubleshoot issues, share tips, and improve their knowledge of the tool.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to VS Code
    Foam relies on Visual Studio Code as its primary environment. Users who prefer different text editors or platforms might find this limitation restrictive and less convenient.
  • Learning Curve
    Although Foam leverages Markdown, users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with VS Code or the specific features and extensions required to maximize Foam's capabilities.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    Foam can struggle with performance issues when handling large datasets or a high number of notes. This can lead to slow response times and inefficient workflows.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Foam is primarily designed for desktop use within VS Code, which means that mobile support is limited. Users looking for a seamless cross-platform experience might find this aspect lacking.
  • Customization Complexity
    While Foam offers a high degree of customization, setting up and configuring the tool to meet personal preferences and workflows can be complex and time-consuming for some users.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Supernotes
Foam

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Supernotes is considered a good application for individuals and teams looking for a streamlined and collaborative note-taking experience.

Why this product is good

  • Supernotes is well-regarded for its minimalist and intuitive interface, which supports efficient note-taking and collaboration. The platform allows for quick creation and organization of notes using a card-based system, promoting better information retention and accessibility. Real-time collaboration and markdown support are additional features that users find beneficial.

Recommended for

  • Students who need a platform for organizing class notes.
  • Professionals looking for a collaborative note-taking tool for team projects.
  • Individuals who prefer a clean and efficient interface for personal note management.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Foam is a good tool for those seeking an open-source environment for note-taking and knowledge management, particularly if they appreciate an approach based on markdown files and integration within a powerful text editor like Visual Studio Code. Its flexibility and user-driven customization make it suitable for users who enjoy tweaking and optimizing their workspace according to their workflow.

Why this product is good

  • Foam is a personal knowledge management and sharing system inspired by Roam Research, offering an open-source solution built on top of Visual Studio Code. It provides users with capabilities to create and interlink notes using markdown files, offering flexibility and customization suited to personal preferences. Foam supports features like backlinking, graph visualization of notes, and integration with VS Code extensions, making it a robust tool for managing interconnected information effectively.

Recommended for

  • Individuals preferring markdown-based note-taking systems
  • Developers familiar with Visual Studio Code
  • Users who appreciate open-source software and community-driven projects
  • People interested in managing complex, interconnected knowledge bases

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Supernotes 1 video + Add
Foam 3 videos + Add

Supernotes | The new collaborative note-taking app

These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review

More videos

  • - Arrowzoom Foam Review
  • - Ryobi Foam Blaster VS. Amazon Foam Cannon | Review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Supernotes
Foam
100% 100%
0% 0%
55% 55%
45% 45%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Supernotes and Foam. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Supernotes 22 mentions
Foam 49 mentions
  • SN Pro – a free, open-source font designed for Markdown
    Hey everyone, OP (Tobias) here. We're excited to release SN Pro today, a friendly new typeface that's open source and free for both personal and commercial use. We've carefully re-designed each character, improving support for Markdown... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Supernotes App: Get 20 free cards when you sign up using referal code
    Want to try a new way to take notes? Join me on Supernotes, and use my code `xkQEcM` to get 20 extra cards after you sign up. https://supernotes.app. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Why are there no good note taking apps
    Note-taking app [1] founder here. This is a question I hear almost every day, and there's a good reason for that. Note-taking is personal. Everyone wants a note-taking app with just the right features for their personal workflow –... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

View more

  • AI Coding Tip 020 - Create a Second Brain
    Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Migrating from DokuWiki to Obsidian
    I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I Use Obsidian
    I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Supernotes and Foam

When comparing Supernotes and Foam, you can also consider the following products.

  • Obsidian

    A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

    Compare Obsidian to Supernotes or Foam:

  • Logseq

    Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.

    Compare Logseq to Supernotes or Foam:

  • Bear

    Bear.app is a note-taking and content writing app that helps you boost productivity with its intuitive tools.

    Compare Bear to Supernotes or Foam:

  • Notion

    All-in-one workspace. One tool for your whole team. Write, plan, and get organized.

    Compare Notion to Supernotes or Foam:

  • Zim Wiki

    Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.

    Compare Zim Wiki to Supernotes or Foam:

  • Evernote

    Bring your life's work together in one digital workspace. Evernote is the place to collect inspirational ideas, write meaningful words, and move your important projects forward.

    Compare Evernote to Supernotes or Foam: