Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

SubnetLens VS cppq

Compare SubnetLens VS cppq and see what are their differences

SubnetLens

Windows visual network scanner for IT admins, names every device, identifies it if possible, 26 built-in tools, live monitoring, and per-device port-change alerts. 100% local.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $79 / One-off (Pro Version)
Alternatives Is it good?
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
BusinessLOG SOC
A centralized log management and SIEM platform built for compliance, auditing, anomaly detection, and infrastructure visibility. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, SubnetLens seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Network Monitoring popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SubnetLens
cppq
Website subnetlens.com github.com
Pricing
Freemium $79 / One-off (Pro Version) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Windows
—
Company Startup from the United Kingdom · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in
Network & Admin Network Monitoring Networking Port Scanners Sysadmin Tools +2
—

About SubnetLens and cppq

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

SubnetLens
cppq

Subnetlens is a Windows desktop network scanner for IT pros, sysadmins, MSPs, and home-labbers everything runs 100% locally, with no cloud and no telemetry. Open it and within seconds it discovers every device on your network, names each one and works out what it is (it recognizes 1,451 device...

Read more about SubnetLens

No description of cppq yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SubnetLens 12 features
cppq 5 features
  • Platform
    Windows 10 / 11 (desktop)
  • Pricing
    Free tier + $79 one-time Pro — no subscription
  • Data privacy
    100% local — no cloud, no telemetry, no account
  • Device identification
    Names every device — 1,451-type classifier
  • Live monitoring
    Continuous mDNS/SSDP (Live Mode)
  • Port history
    Per-device, with "new service" alerts
  • Topology map
    Interactive, multiple layouts + export
  • Built-in IT tools
    26 (ping, traceroute, MTR, DNS, WHOIS, TLS…)
  • Credential vault
    AES-256-GCM, stored on-device
  • Risk scoring
    Per-device + deep security scans
  • Integrations
    Prometheus, webhooks (Slack/Discord/Teams), SNMP
  • Scheduled scans
    Cron + interval, with webhook alerts
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SubnetLens
cppq

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about SubnetLens (subnetlens.com) in my knowledge base, so I can't confirm its features, quality, or reputation with confidence. It may be a newer or niche tool that isn't well-documented in publicly available sources I was trained on. I'd recommend checking recent user reviews, testing any free tier or trial, and verifying claims directly on their website before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Insufficient verified data available to confirm specific strengths or unique selling points of this product
  • Unable to validate claims about accuracy, pricing, or performance without firsthand or well-documented third-party sources
  • Recommend checking current reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, G2, or Reddit for real user experiences
  • Look for transparency about the company, its team, and how the tool sources or processes network/subnet data

Recommended for

  • Users who want to independently verify tool credibility before adoption
  • Network administrators or IT professionals researching subnet calculation or management tools who should compare multiple options
  • Anyone willing to test a free trial or demo version before making a purchasing decision

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SubnetLens
cppq
100% 100%
Network Monitoring
0% 0%
100% 100%
Networking
0% 0%
100% 100%
Network & Admin
0% 0%
100% 100%
Sysadmin Tools
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing SubnetLens and cppq.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

SubnetLens's answer

System admins, Network or IT Professionas

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

SubnetLens's answer

  • Electron + React — the desktop app
  • Node.js — the scanning engine and 26 diagnostic tools
  • Vite + Tailwind CSS — the UI
  • vis-network — the interactive topology map
  • A privacy-first Cloudflare Workers backend for licensing (no user data stored)

What's the story behind your product?

SubnetLens's answer

SubnetLens started from a simple frustration: the free network scanners are basic and barely maintained, while the capable tools are either cloud subscriptions or cost thousands a year per site. There wasn't a modern, local-first option that just told you what's on your network and watched it for changes — without sending your data to someone else's cloud. So we built one: a fast, visual Windows scanner that names every device, tracks how your network changes over time, and keeps 100% of the data on your machine. One-time price, no telemetry.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

SubnetLens's answer

  • SMB and solo IT admins managing a network without a big budget
  • Sysadmins, MSPs and IT contractors doing discovery and audits
  • Home-lab and self-hosting enthusiasts who want to see and monitor every device Anyone who finds Advanced IP Scanner too basic but won't pay $1,000/year for an enterprise SaaS tool.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

SubnetLens's answer

  • vs Advanced IP Scanner / Angry IP Scanner — free but basic and barely updated. SubnetLens adds live monitoring, port history, risk scoring, a credential vault and a modern UI.
  • vs Fing Desktop — no subscription. SubnetLens is one-time $79 and tracks ports per device, not just devices.
  • vs Auvik / Domotz / Lansweeper — no cloud dependency and no $500–1,000/year/site bill. Your data stays local and you pay once. More capable than the free tools, far cheaper than the enterprise ones, and everything stays on your machine.

What makes your product unique?

SubnetLens's answer

A few things no other consumer-priced scanner combines: - It names and identifies every device — recognizes 1,451 device types by hostname, so you see "Canon G5000 printer" or "Synology NAS," not just an IP. - Per-device port history — records the exact moment a new service opens on a device, so you catch a server that suddenly started running RDP. Enterprise tools charge thousands a year for this. - Live Mode — continuous mDNS/SSDP listening catches devices the moment they appear, between scans. - 100% local — no cloud, no telemetry, no account. Your scan data never leaves your machine. - One one-time price, with an encrypted credential vault, 26 IT tools, scheduling, SNMP, IPAM and a Prometheus endpoint all bundled in.

User comments

Share your experience with using SubnetLens and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

SubnetLens 1 mention
cppq 0 mentions
  • Ask HN: What are your personal websites?
    My new application https://subnetlens.com/ What do you guys think of my work? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to SubnetLens and cppq

When comparing SubnetLens and cppq, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...