No styled-components videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, GitHub Pages should be more popular than styled-components. It has been mentiond 467 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Hey, I’m not an expert on every single JavaScript styling library, so take this as you will. The bulk of my experience is with Styled Components. It is an excellent tool popular with most of the works I've done. - Source: dev.to / about 2 hours ago
CSS-in-JS is a styling technique wherein CSS is composed using JavaScript instead of defined in external files. This method allows CSS to be scoped locally to components rather than globally, reducing the probability of style conflicts. Utilizing JavaScript also enables dynamic styling easily aligned with the component's state or props. Libraries like Styled Components and Emotion are popular choices in the React... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Styled-components: Allows for maintainable styling with CSS-in-JS. Learn more. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Over the past few years, I've worked with React apps utilising various CSS-in-JS libraries, starting with styled-components, transitioning through emotion, Theme UI, and finally Stitches. I've also integrated MUI, Mantine, and Chakra in numerous client projects. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
There are several alternatives to MUI. shadcn/ui is a modern alternative that is very popular. Ant Design is also a great alternative. Charkra UI can also be used as a UI Framework. Some people suggest just using styled components. Some use Tailwind CSS. Yet, for both styled components and Tailwind CSS, one still writes a lot of CSS. This might not provide the best developer experience compared to using a UI... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
You can deploy to Github Pages in under 2 minutes by following their documentation. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket