Strapi
Contentful
Sanity.io
Directus
WordPress
Payload CMS
Prismic
Ghost
RailsAdmin
Active Admin
Jet Admin
Forest Admin
Avo
Motor Admin
Tailwind CSS
Flatlogic
Strapi RailsAdminStrapi is recommended for developers and development teams looking for a flexible and customizable CMS solution, particularly those who need a headless CMS that integrates easily with modern frontend frameworks like React, Vue, or Angular. It's also suitable for organizations that prefer an open-source solution they can modify according to their needs.
No RailsAdmin videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Strapi seems to be a lot more popular than RailsAdmin. While we know about 341 links to Strapi, we've tracked only 8 mentions of RailsAdmin. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
That's not true anymore. In 2026, developers are switching away from Strapi at a pace that's hard to ignore โ not because it got worse, but because the alternatives got dramatically better. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
CMS content. Headless CMS responses from Strapi, Sanity, or Contentful are deeply nested. Type them once; let the compiler catch template bugs. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Strapi is an open-source, Node.js-based headless CMS that gives developers full control over content APIs. Itโs self-hosted, fully customizable, and supports REST and GraphQL, making it a favorite among developers building JAMstack and API-first applications. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
This is where Strapi a flexible and scalable content management solution is needed. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Strapi offers multiple authentication methods to secure your application:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Like most things, it's probably a combination of things. The Django Admin existed before Django publicly existed. That meant that once anyone started using Django they knew that they should constrain their use of Django in certain ways so that the Django Admin would work with their usage. Features that would be added to Django would be built with the Django Admin in mind. Many tools like Flask or FastAPI don't... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
We briefly considered migrating to a full-grown Rails admin interface, such as ActiveAdmin, RailsAdmin, Administrate or Avo. We especially liked Avo which is built on a very modern stack similar to ours (Tailwind + Hotwire + ViewComponents). In the end, we didnโt go this route as we found some of the options a bit too restrictive (even though Avo is very flexible) and we did not feel like trying to amend it to our... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Https://github.com/railsadminteam/rails_admin Is very popular and I find it very easy to use. Source: over 4 years ago
It's really helpful to have a way to track what's going on with your application in production, things like: number of user sign ups, status of user accounts, number of X new database entries etc. Out of the box dashboards like Rails Admin are great but only go so far, eventually you will want significant customizations. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
I'm working on a rails project with rails_admin and multiple models. There are several people working on the backend and I want to remove the ability to edit some of the records which have a imported boolean set to true. This records should just be readable in rails_admin. Source: almost 5 years ago
Contentful - You don't need another CMS. You need a better way to manage content โ unified, structured, and ready to deploy to any digital channel.
Active Admin - The administration framework for business critical Ruby on Rails applications.
Sanity.io - Sanity.io a platform for structured content that comes with an open-source editor that you can customize with React.js.
Jet Admin - Build business apps really fast
Directus - Free and Open-Source Headless CMS
Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.
