Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Storify VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Storify VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Storify

Create stories using social media. Turn what people post on social media into compelling stories. Collect the best photos, video, tweets and more to publish them as simple, beautiful stories that can be embedded anywhere.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
mbuzz.co
Multi-touch attribution that shows the model behind the number. 8 models compared side-by-side, a SQL-like DSL to write your own, and open-source SDKs for Ruby, Node, Python, and PHP. Runs server-side. Your data, not theirs. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
Content Marketing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
101 vs 132

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Storify
CrossBrowserTesting
Website storify.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing —
Official pricing
Listed in
Advertising Video Maker Marketing Videos Marketing Calendar +1
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Project Management +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Storify 5 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Storify provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible to users of varying technical expertise.
  • Content Aggregation
    Storify allows users to compile content from multiple social media platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, into a cohesive story.
  • Customization Options
    The platform offers various customization tools to tailor the appearance and structure of stories to fit user preferences.
  • Engagement Features
    Users can interact with their audience through commenting and sharing features, facilitating greater engagement with the content.
  • Collaborative Editing
    Storify supports collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to contribute and edit stories simultaneously.

Possible disadvantages

  • Closure Announcement
    As of December 2017, it was announced that Storify would shut down its service, creating a major drawback for potential users.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    For experienced users looking for in-depth analytics or extensive customization options, Storify may lack some advanced features available in other platforms.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Platforms
    Since Storify relies heavily on third-party social media content, any changes in the APIs of platforms like Twitter and Facebook can affect its functionality.
  • No Longer Supported
    With its service terminated, there will be no further updates or customer support, leaving current users without assistance or future enhancements.
  • Content Export Limitations
    Exporting content from Storify to other formats or platforms can be cumbersome, which may inhibit easy migration to other services.
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Storify
CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • Storify was shut down in May 2018, so it is no longer available for use. While it was operational, it was considered a valuable tool for content curation and storytelling.

Why this product is good

  • Storify was once a popular social network service that allowed users to create stories or timelines using social media posts and other web content. It was well-regarded for its ability to curate and compile content from various sources into a coherent narrative, which was useful for journalists, digital storytellers, and marketers.

Recommended for

    When it was operational, Storify was recommended for journalists, bloggers, educators, and anyone interested in digital storytelling or content curation. However, since the service is no longer available, users will need to look for alternative tools that offer similar capabilities.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Storify 3 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Storify Review

More videos

  • - Storify App Review for iPad
  • - Bye-bye Storify...Hello Wakelet - How To Tell A Better Story In 2018

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Storify
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
Content Marketing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Testing
100% 100%
100% 100%
Advertising
0% 0%
0% 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Storify and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Storify 0 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

Tracking Storify since Mar 2021.

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Storify and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing Storify and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...