Software Alternatives & Startups

Stillio VS CaptureAPI.dev

Compare Stillio VS CaptureAPI.dev and see what are their differences

Stillio

The #1 website screenshot service • Capture and archive website screenshots automatically • Every hour, day, week or Month • Start your free trial now.

Stillio Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
CaptureAPI.dev

Screenshot & PDF API for Developers. Capture website screenshots, convert HTML to PDF, and generate OG images with a simple API call.

CaptureAPI.dev Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $9 / Monthly (Starter)

Which is more popular?

Screenshots popularity
82% vs 18%
alternatives listed
87 vs 14

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Stillio
CaptureAPI.dev
Website stillio.com captureapi.dev
Pricing
Freemium $9 / Monthly (Starter) Official pricing
Company Startup from Spain
Listed in

About Stillio and CaptureAPI.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Stillio
CaptureAPI.dev

No description of Stillio yet.

CaptureAPI is a developer-focused serverless API for capturing website screenshots (PNG, JPEG), converting HTML to PDF, and generating Open Graph images. Built on Playwright + Chromium, it supports 5 viewport presets (Mobile, Tablet, Desktop HD, 4K, Custom), CSS selector targeting, watermarks,...

Read more about CaptureAPI.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Stillio 5 features
CaptureAPI.dev 5 features
  • Automated Website Screenshots
    Stillio provides automated solutions for capturing website screenshots at regular intervals, saving time and effort for users who need to archive web pages consistently.
  • Customizable Schedule
    Users can set their own schedule for taking screenshots, allowing flexibility in how often and when screenshots are captured based on individual needs.
  • Comprehensive Archives
    By automating the capture of web pages over time, users can build comprehensive archives that can be valuable for legal evidence, website monitoring, or competitive analysis.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Stillio offers a straightforward and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for users of varying technical backgrounds to get started with minimal learning curve.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Stillio supports integration with various third-party services, making it versatile for users who want to export screenshots to other applications or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Stillio is a paid service, which might be a concern for users or businesses with limited budgets, especially when there are free alternatives for simple screenshot needs.
  • Limited Editing Features
    While Stillio offers automated screenshots, it lacks advanced editing features within the platform, requiring users to use external tools if editing is needed.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Automated screenshot capture involves storing website data, which can raise privacy issues depending on the nature of the content and the rules of data governance followed.
  • Dependency on Web Accessibility
    The effectiveness of Stillio depends on the accessibility and functionality of the target websites, with issues arising if websites implement anti-bot measures or dynamic content loading.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Though the basic features are user-friendly, some users might find a steeper learning curve when trying to utilize more advanced integrations and customizations.
  • Output Formats
    PNG, JPEG, PDF, OG images
  • Free Tier
    200 screenshots/month, no card required
  • Engine
    Playwright + Chromium (serverless)
  • Viewport Presets
    Mobile, Tablet, Desktop HD, 4K, Custom
  • Batch Endpoint
    Multiple URLs per API call

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Stillio
CaptureAPI.dev

No analysis of Stillio yet.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, up-to-date information about CaptureAPI.dev specifically, so I can't confirm its quality, reliability, or reputation firsthand. Based on its name, it appears to be a website/screenshot capture API service, and my assessment is general rather than based on confirmed user reviews or benchmarks.

Why this product is good

  • If it functions as described (a screenshot/webpage capture API), such tools are generally useful for automating visual content generation
  • API-based capture services typically offer developer-friendly integration via REST endpoints
  • Many similar services offer features like PDF generation, full-page screenshots, and custom viewport sizing
  • Pricing for niche capture APIs is often more affordable than building in-house infrastructure

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to verify current pricing, uptime, and feature set directly from the provider before committing
  • Teams who should test the API with a free trial or sandbox environment if available
  • Users who should check independent reviews, GitHub mentions, or community feedback for real-world performance data
  • Businesses requiring SLA guarantees, who should confirm this directly with the vendor rather than relying on assumptions

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Stillio
CaptureAPI.dev
82% 82%
18% 18%
80% 80%
20% 20%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Stillio and CaptureAPI.dev.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

  • Independent SaaS founders using CaptureAPI for OG image generation
  • Content and growth teams generating automated blog cover screenshots
  • Small B2B platforms archiving compliance documents (PDF + screenshot)
  • Side-project builders integrating preview images into their dashboards

Named customer references available on request as the user base grows.

What makes your product unique?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

CaptureAPI bundles website screenshots, HTML-to-PDF conversion, and OG image generation into a single predictable API endpoint. Unlike heavy headless-browser platforms, it offers a 200/month free tier, transparent flat-rate pricing, and a developer-first design with no per-call billing surprises.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Three reasons: (1) honest free tier — 200 captures/month, no credit card; (2) flat pricing ($9 / $29 / $79) instead of per-call confusion; (3) screenshot, PDF, and OG image generation all in one API rather than three separate services.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Indie developers, side-project builders, and small SaaS engineering teams who need a reliable screenshot/PDF/OG API without enterprise contracts. Common use cases: OG image generation, blog cover screenshots, automated archiving, and product preview generation for landing pages.

What's the story behind your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

CaptureAPI was built by an indie maker tired of stitching together Puppeteer scripts, paying enterprise prices for a single feature, and dealing with hidden rate-limit surprises. It launched in early 2026 as part of the DevToolsmith portfolio with the goal of offering screenshot, PDF, and OG generation under one developer-friendly API.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Next.js 16, TypeScript, Vercel Functions (Fluid Compute), Playwright for headless rendering, Sharp for image processing, Upstash Redis for rate limiting and caching, Stripe for billing, and Sentry for observability. Serverless on EU + US edge for low latency.

User comments

Share your experience with using Stillio and CaptureAPI.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Stillio and CaptureAPI.dev

When comparing Stillio and CaptureAPI.dev, you can also consider the following products.