Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Step CI VS Restfox.dev

Compare Step CI VS Restfox.dev and see what are their differences

Step CI logo Step CI

API Testing and Monitoring made simple

Restfox.dev logo Restfox.dev

Browser based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman
  • Step CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-13
  • Restfox.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-26

Step CI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Step CI provides an intuitive user interface that makes it accessible for users of varying technical expertise. This ease of use helps teams adopt it without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration
    Step CI integrates seamlessly with a variety of third-party tools and services, allowing teams to create flexible and powerful CI pipelines without extensive reconfiguration of their existing environment.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle projects of different sizes, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises looking to scale their continuous integration processes.
  • Customization
    Step CI offers plenty of customization options, enabling teams to tailor their CI/CD pipelines according to specific project requirements and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Step CI

  • Pricing
    Pricing for Step CI may be higher compared to other CI/CD tools, especially for startups or smaller teams with limited budgets.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation insufficient or lacking in detail, which can lead to slower implementation and troubleshooting times.
  • Feature Gaps
    While Step CI offers a robust set of features, there may be certain advanced functionalities that other competitors provide, which Step CI may lack, potentially leading to constraints for some users.

Restfox.dev features and specs

  • Intuitive Interface
    Restfox.dev provides a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for developers to interact with and test APIs. The design is streamlined to enhance user experience, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    Restfox.dev is accessible on various platforms, including web and desktop applications, allowing developers the flexibility to use the tool on different devices and operating systems.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    The tool offers a wide range of features such as request history, environment variables, and customizable settings, providing developers with advanced capabilities to manage API testing more efficiently.
  • Responsive Support
    Restfox.dev is known for its responsive customer support, with an active development team that prioritizes user feedback and regularly updates the tool with new features and improvements.

Possible disadvantages of Restfox.dev

  • Limited Free Tier
    While Restfox.dev does offer a free version, some advanced features are locked behind a paid subscription, which might be a limitation for developers or small teams looking for a full-fledged free solution.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    The web version of Restfox.dev requires a stable internet connection to operate, which might be a limitation for users who prefer offline access or encounter connectivity issues.
  • Steep Pricing for Premium Features
    The premium subscription required to access some of the advanced features might be considered expensive, especially for individual developers or startups with limited budgets.
  • Lack of Community Forums
    Unlike some competitor tools, Restfox.dev lacks a robust community forum for users to share tips, solutions, and best practices, which might limit community-driven support and resource sharing.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Step CI and Restfox.dev)
Developer Tools
45 45%
55% 55
API
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
40 40%
60% 60
APIs
35 35%
65% 65

User comments

Share your experience with using Step CI and Restfox.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Step CI should be more popular than Restfox.dev. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Step CI mentions (12)

  • SOAP API Testing Guide
    Key Tools: SoapUI (free and Pro versions) for Functional, security, and load testing or Step CI for a modern, open-source alternative that focused on workflow testing. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Why Feedback Loops Matter in API Development
    CI/CD testing: As mentioned earlier, if you have fast preview deployments Of your API hooked up to your PRs, you can use a tool like StepCI to run integration and end-to-end tests as a part of your development workflow. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Simplifying Back end Testing with qapir.io
    How is it different from Step CI? https://stepci.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
    Top Tools: Use Postman for a visual approach to E2E testing, StepCI for CI/CD integration, and Playwright for all-in-one testing. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • TypeScript NPM Packages Done Right
    The problem is that you can import commonjs modules in ESM but not the other way around. For stepci (https://stepci.com) we have chosen to not support ESM for this very reason. We want that the library โ€œjust worksโ€ for all our users. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Restfox.dev mentions (7)

  • These 20 Awesome API Clients Will Change How You Work with APIs
    Restfox is an offline-first web-based HTTP client with a design inspired by Firefox DevTools. Itโ€™s minimal and designed for speed and privacy. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Yaak 2.0 โ€“ Git, WebSockets, OAuth, and More
    A lot of cool features. I would pay a one time license fee, but not a monthly reoccurring fee for something like this. Currently I am using Restfox. It's entirely free and local/offline friendly. [1]: https://restfox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Bruno
    I personally enjoy using restfox, OSS and in browser, it does the job well. * web app: https://restfox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The Collaborative API Development Platform โ€“ Insomnia
    Https://restfox.dev/ is a great open source, free alternative. You can self host it, import Insomnia project files, etc. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Bruno: Open-Source IDE for Exploring and Testing APIs
    I'm pretty sure restfox (https://restfox.dev) was shared on HN before. Very similar to postman. https://github.com/flawiddsouza/Restfox. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Step CI and Restfox.dev, you can also consider the following products

restclient.el - HTTP REST client tool for emacs

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

RecipeUI - Open source type-safe Postman alternative

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a devโ€‘friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

API Tester - API Tester is the first mobile app to test any type of API on the go. Including REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, SOAP, JSON RPC, XML, HTTP, HTTPS.